Buddhism Intuitive Thinking and Media Literacy of Thai Monks กระบวนการทางปัญญากับการรู้เท่าทันสื่อของพระสงฆ์ในประเทศไทย

Main Article Content

Alicha Treerotchananon



The article “Buddhism Intuitive Thinking and Media Literacy of Thai Monks” was conducted under three objective, to examine the relationship between Buddhist intuitive thinking and media literacy of monks in Thailand. The hypothesis is monks with a better understanding regarding Buddhist intuitive thinking should have better media literacy. This research is an empirical study using data from 235 Buddhist monks in Thailand.  Results indicate that Buddhist intuitive thinking is positive and significant related to media literacy. The results contribute to both the media literacy area of study and to the Thai monk's application of Dhamma study.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Treerotchananon, A. (2019). Buddhism Intuitive Thinking and Media Literacy of Thai Monks: กระบวนการทางปัญญากับการรู้เท่าทันสื่อของพระสงฆ์ในประเทศไทย. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 7(3), 854-871. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/167161
Research Articles


Akti, S., & Gürol, A. (2012). Determining the Relationship between Media Literacy and Social Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 238-243.
Diergarten, A. K., Möckel, T., Nieding, G., & Ohler, P. (2017). The impact of media literacy on children's learning from films and hypermedia. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 48, 33-41.
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Korfmacher, J. E. (1990). Do young children think of television images as pictures or real objects? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(4), 399-419.
Kulthida, T., & Mega, S. (2017). The current state and influential factors in the development of digital literacy in Thailand’s higher education. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 235-251.
Mares, M.-L., & Pan, Z. (2013). Effects of Sesame Street: A meta-analysis of children's learning in 15 countries. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 140-151.
Mares, M.-L., Sivakumar, G., & Stephenson, L. (2015). Frommeta to micro: Examining theeffectiveness of educational TV. American Behavioral Scientist advance online publication. American Behavioral Scientist advance online publication.
Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579-586.
Potter, W. J. (2010). The State of Media Literacy. In (Vol. 54, pp. 675-696).
Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., & King, F. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer nbased instruction Computers in the Schools 5(3-4), 11-147.
Rodloytuk, P. (2007). Buddhist participatory communication for rural development. The Journal of International Communication, 13(1), 119-136.
Sourbati, M. (2009). Media Literacy and Universal Access in Europe. Information Society, 25(4), 248-254.
Suwana, F., & Lily. (2017). Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 212-217.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. In (Vol. 12(2), pp. 235-285.): Cognitive Science.
Şişman, B., & Yurttaş, Ö. U. (2015). An Empirical Study on Media Literacy from the Viewpoint of Media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 798-804.
Zikmund,W.G. (2010) Business Research Method. South-Western/Cengage Publisher.