Online Instruction Coaching Strategies for Teachers in Secondary Schools

Main Article Content

Supanat Sararat
Buntarika Bulpakdi
Jurairat Sudrung

Abstract

The purposes of this article were 1) to study the current and desirable conditions of online instruction coaching; 2) to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of online instruction coaching; and 3) to formulate online instruction coaching strategies for teachers in secondary schools. The research design was mixed research. The population was secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The sample consisted of 180 schools using multi-stage sampling. There were 5 informants per school, consisting of the school director, the deputy director of the academic administration group, the head of the learning subject group and 2 teachers, totaling 900 people. The research instruments were questionnaire and suitability assessment form of draft strategy. The statistics for data analysis were frequency, mean, standard deviation, percentage, priority need index, and content analysis.


The results found that the overall current condition was at a moderate level and the overall desirable condition was at a high level. When considering each aspect, the evaluation and assessment of instruction had the highest average value. In terms of measurement and evaluation of teaching and learning management, the average was at the highest level. The highest priority index for online instruction coaching was the selection of teaching and learning platforms. Strategies for online instruction coaching of secondary school teachers included 3 key strategies, 6 sub-strategies, and 29 procedures. The main strategies were 1) developing policies and managing online instruction coaching 2) promoting online instruction coaching, and 3) supporting re-analysis to evaluate and follow up online instruction coaching.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sararat, S., Bulpakdi, B., & Sudrung, J. (2023). Online Instruction Coaching Strategies for Teachers in Secondary Schools. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 7(4), 1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.14456/jeir.2023.108
Section
Research Article

References

Beach, D. M., & Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory Leadership: Focus on Instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Boonnak, S., Phupimthong, B., Tanpan, J., Lawansiri, P., & Anonchan, S. (2021). A Model of Online Instructional Development of Mahamakut Buddhist University, Srilanchang Campus. Journal of Srilanchang Review, 7(2), 53-70.

Costa, A. L., & Garmton, R. J. (2002). Cognitive Coaching : A Foundation for Renaissance School (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.

Dokmai, P., Supprakob, S., Potisart, J., & Prachopchok, P. (2023). The Development of Online Teacher Professional Development Program to Enhance Learning Management Ability in STEM Education of Freshman Science Student Teachers. STOU Education Journal, 16(1), 176-194.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and Instructional Leadership (10th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Gottesman, B. L., & Jennings, J. O. (2000). Peer Coaching for Educators (2nd ed.). Lancaster: Technimic.

Joyce, R. B., & Shower, B. (1988). Student Achievement Though Staff Development. New York: Longman.

Knight, J. (2009). Coaching: Approaches and Perspectives. California: Corwin.

Kongmanus, K. (2018). Digital Learning Tools: Ways of Digital Education Era. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 20(4), 279-290.

Laorueandee, W. (2013). Instructional Supervision and Coaching Science of Professional Development: Strategic Theory to Practice (12th ed.). Nakhornprathom: Silpakorn University Press.

Maneeon, S. (2017). The Teacher Development in the 21st Century with Coaching Technique. Journal of Education Silapakorn University, 15(2), 61-73.

Mink, O. G., Owen, K. Q., & Mink, B. P. (1993). Developing High Performance People: The Art of Coaching (3rd ed.). Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Nernprom, A. (2023). The Development of Blended Supervision Process with Cooperative Supervision to Enhance Learning Management Competencies of Vocational Teachers in Industrial and Community Education Colleges in The Southern Area. Institute of Vocational Education Southern Region 1 Journal, 8(1), 13-22.

Niyomrat, P., Artpairin, J., Watcharakan, P., & Raksatan, C. (2021). Online Teaching Format under The Circumstances of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Human Society, 11(2), 1-16.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2020). Guidelines for Teaching of Schools Under The Office of The Basic Education Commission In The Situation of The Pandemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Academic Year 2020. Bangkok: Department of Academic Affair and Educational Standard.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2022). Basic Educational Development Plan (2023 – 2027). Bangkok: Department of Policy and Basic Educational Plan.

Office of the Education Council. (2017). The National Education Plan 2017 -2036. Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic.

Office of the Education Council. (2020). Online Learning in The COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Crisis or Opportunity of Thai Education. Bangkok: Department of Educational Standards and Learning Development.

Office of the Education Council. (2021). Learning Model for Students at The Basic Education Level in COVID-19 Pandemic Situation. Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic.

Office of the Education Council. (2022). Model of Learning Management by Digital Platforms with The Participation of The Private Organizations. Bangkok: 21 Century.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2022). A framework to Guide An Education Response to The COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O1hZMx32LIVabpfhPg_dSO9hlgIsmhLi/view?fbclid=IwAR13qE5B2G5xvupngwSx2n5U-c-7CoH4f6zrVBfEV6EJtzCdveqhMCXdWWw

Pasatcha, P. (2020). A Development of Pracharath Schools Master Teachers by Integrating Information Technology and 21st Century Skills Learning Management Through Coaching and Mentoring System. Journal of Teacher Professional Development, 1(1), 32-44.

Podapol, C. (2020). Online Learning Management: New Normal of Education. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://slc.mbu.ac.th/article/28181

Rattanaphan, N., Jaroensuk, B., & Boonchit, Y. (2022). A Development of Internal Supervision Mannual Through A Guiding Process And Mentoring System of Basic Education Schools Under The Chanuanniphan Network, Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Journal of MCU Ubon Review, 7(3), 741-754.

Rittikoop, W. (2019). Instructional Coaching: Guidelines for The Development of Teacher’s Instruction. Ratchaphruek Journal, 17(1), 1-10.

Satsin, T., & Wongwiseskul, S. (2021). Lessons Learned from Online Teaching: Challenges for Teachers under COVID - 19 Situations. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 22(1), 1-9.

Siribanpitak, P. (2009). Educational Administration and Management for A Small World. Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic.

Somjettana, M., & Amornsiriphong, S. (2021). The Implementation of Thailand’s Basic Education Institutional Policy During The Coronavirus Disease Pandemic (COVID-19). Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 443-460.

Sudrung, J. (2016). In School Supervision. Bangkok: Danex.

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2020). How to Teaching in The COVID-19 Situation: from Foreign to Thai Lessons. Retrieved June 19, 2023, from https://tdri.or.th/2020/05/examples-of-teaching-and-learning-in-covid-19-pandemic/

Wayo, W., Charoennukul, A., Kankaynat, C., & Konyai, J. (2020). Online Learning under The COVID-19 Epidemic : Concepts and Applications of Teaching and Learning Management. Regional Health Promotion Center 9 Journal, 14(34), 285-298.

Weiers, M. R. (2005). Introduction to Business Statistics (5th ed.). Pensyllvania: Brooks/Cole.

Wongwanich, S. (2019). Need Assessment Research (4th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Wongyai, W., & Patpol, M. (2014). Cognitive Coaching (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Jaransanitwong Press.