Effect of 5 STEPs learning process on learning achievement and scientific creativity of Prathomsuksa 5 students under the Ayutthaya Primary Educational Service Area Office 1
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this article were 1) to compare students’ science achievement and 2) to compare students’ scientific creativity between pre-learning and post-learning through 5 STEPs learning process of Prathomsuksa 5 students under the Ayutthaya Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The research model was experimental research. The sample consisted of 15 students at Wat Lay (taweepunya) school in the first semester of the academic year 2022 using purposive sampling. The instruments were: 1) twenty lesson plans of 5 STEPs learning process; 2) science achievement test; and 3) scientific creativity test. Data were analyzed by using mean, standard deviation, and t-test Dependent samples.
The findings showed that: 1) The students’ post-learning science achievement who learned through 5 STEPs learning process in Science and Technology subject after learning was higher than pre-learning significantly different at .05. 2) The students’ post-learning scientific creativity who learned through 5 STEPs learning process after learning was higher than pre-learning significantly different at .05.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Appamano, I. (2019). Development of academic achievement and scientific process skills of prathomsuksa 2 students using 5 – step ladder learning management. (Master of Education). Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University.
Atin, S. (2019). The science and art of learning management in the 21st century. Bangkok: KhonKaen University Printing House.
Charoenthip, N. (1999). Scientific Creativity: A Holistic Perspective, Volume 1. Bangkok: Siam Over Cheese Pro Company Limited.
Chuayphan, P. (2017). Effects of using the 5-step learning process on scientific process skills. and scientific creativity, science learning subject group of Mathayom 3 students. Journal of Education Thaksin University, 17(2), 163-173.
Dechakupt, P., & Yindeesuk, P. (2015). Learning management in the 21st century. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology, (IPST). (2012). Professional science teacher. Guidelines for learning Effective teaching. Bangkok: Inter Education Supplies.
Jitchayawanich, K. (2020).Methods for organizing learning in the 21st century. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
Kanthiya, P. (2016). The Development of Analytical Thinking Skills for Science through Five Steps Learning Management of Secondary School. Journal of Graduate Research, 7(2),137-152.
Ministry of Education. (2017). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551. Bangkok: The Agriculture Co-operative Fere-deration of Thailand Printing National.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2012). Guidelines for organizing teaching and learning in schools, international standards. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Assembly Press of Thailand.
Panmanee, A. (2014). Train to think. Think creatively. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Phasiphon, C. (2016).Measuring and evaluating learning outcomes. Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University Press.
Phattiyathani, S. (2019). Educational measurement. Kalasin: Prasan Printing.
Ritjaroon, P. (2016). Principles of educational measurement and evaluation. Bangkok: House of Curmist.
Tanak, E. (2020). Teaching how to think like a scientist. Bangkok: Cyberprint Group.
Torrence, E. P. (1992). A National Climate for Creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today, 5(1),10-14.