The Administration Standards of Partnership School
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research's objectives were to find: 1) Partnership school administration standards and indicators, and 2) Partnership school confirmation results for administration standards and indicators. Three primary schools served as the unit of analysis. Under the Office of the Basic Education Commission and the informant by each school, there were four people: the Director of the school, the Deputy Director of the school, the teacher, and the school of Education Commission. A semi-structured interview and an opinionnaire were Developed and used as tools for integrating the experts' opinions and perspectives. The Experts were 102 primary schools, who attended the partnership schools project generated by the Office of the Basic Education Commission. Frequency, percentage and content analysis were used in the statistical analysis.
The research findings of this research were to follow:
1. Standards and administrative indicators for partnership schools consist of 3 standards,
16 aspects, and 98 indicators., The first standard, student quality, 2 aspects, 20 indicators. The second standard, 2) Administration and management, 9 aspects, 46 indicators. The third standard, 3) The process of teaching- and learning process, which attaches great that focuses on importance to learners, 5 aspects, 32 indicators.
2. The confirmation of the standard and the indicators for the administration of the partnership schools, 186 experts or 100 percent agreed with the 95 indicators, while the other three indicators in standard 1, aspects 2, indicator 4, Administration Academic business, 56 experts or 30.11 percent agreed with the finaling, and 130 experts or 69.89 percent disagreed with the finaling. The indicator 5, Supervision and monitoring of educational school quality management by Board of Basic Education Institutions were agreed with the finagling, 120 experts or 64.52 percent While 66 experts or 35.48 percent were disagreed and the standard 2, aspects 2, indicator 5, Internal supervision by participation of partnership, 170 experts or 91.39 percent were disagreed with the finaling, and 16 experts or 8.61 percent agreed with the finaling.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
นงลักษณ์ วิรัชชัย. (2551). การพัฒนาตัวบ่งชี้การประเมิน. การประชุมวิชาการเปิดขอบฟ้าคุณธรรมจริยธรรม. วันที่ 29 สิงหาคม 2551 ณ โรงแรมแอมบาสเดอร์. กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยมหามงกุฎราชวิทยาลัย วิทยาเขตอีสาน.
Bureau of Educational Testing.(2020).Establishing Educational Standards for Educational Institutions. Bangkok: N.A. Rattanatrading Partnership Limited.
Epstein, J. L. and others. (2009). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action. 2nd. California: A sage Publications Company Thousand Oaks.
Howard,S. and Taylor,L. (2001).School-Community Partnerships : A Guide In The School Mental Health Project. California: UCLA.
John C. (1998).Leadership and the Tearning Organization in Self Managing School. Victoria: University of Melbourne.
Johnstone, J. N. (1981). Indicators of Education System. London: McGraw-Hill.
Kilpatrick, S.,Johns, S. and Mulford, B. (2003).Maturing School–Community Partnerships: Developing Learning Communities in Rural Australia. Australia: University of Tasmania.
National Parent Teacher Association. (2015). PTA National Standards for Family-School Partnerships: An Implementation Guide (Research Report). National Parent Teacher Association.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018).Partnership School Project. Bangkok:Aksornthai Printing House.
Roche, M. K. and Kelly Vaillancourt Stronach. (2019). Nine Elements of Effective School Community Partnerships to Address student Mental Health, Physical Health, and Overall Wellness. (Research Report). Institute for Educational Leadership, National.
Sandra, M. (2005).Analysis of Characteristics of Effective School and Business Partnerships : A Case Study of a Medium Size Florida District (Doctoral Dissertation). Florida State University College of Education.
Misuna, S. (2022). The Deputy Director of Suphanburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. Interview, February 18-19, 2022.
Pissuwan,S.(2019).Problems of Thai Education and the Inferiority of Global Competitiveness. Retrieved Jan 10, 2019, From http://urll.us./uKvAV
The Council for Corporate and School Partnerships. (2022). A How-to Guide for School-Business partnerships. Retrieved March 8, 2019, from https://outreach.ou.edu/educationalservices/ education/edutas/comprehensive-centers-archive/knowledgebases/response-to-intervention knowledgebase/be-aware- of-non-financial-resources/a-how