The Model of Bodhisattva Precepts Practice for Sustainable Cultivation Development in Chinese Buddhism in Modern Society
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study employs a qualitative documentary research design to examine the practice of bodhisattva precepts in Chinese Buddhism in the context of modern society. The research has three objectives: (1) to investigate the evolutionary values and effects of bodhisattva precepts in Chinese Buddhism in modern society; (2) to identify ways to promote the sustainable cultivation and development of bodhisattva precepts practice; and (3) to propose a model of bodhisattva precepts practice for sustainable cultivation and development in Chinese Buddhism in modern society. Data were collected from primary Buddhist texts, Chinese and English academic studies, and modern literature related to Buddhist ethics, cultivation, and contemporary social development. The data were analyzed through descriptive, thematic, analytical, and interpretive approaches.
The findings show that bodhisattva precepts have maintained enduring significance in Chinese Buddhism through their strong ethical foundation, adaptability, and capacity to respond to changing historical and social conditions. Their continuity across Chinese Mahāyāna traditions demonstrates both doctrinal resilience and practical relevance. The study further finds that sustainable cultivation development depends on several interrelated conditions, including continuous study, systematic training, precept ordination, ongoing preaching and learning, adaptation to contemporary social life, and constructive integration with broader social and developmental agendas. On this basis, the study proposes a model of bodhisattva precept practice comprising six interdependent dimensions: mental content, theory, practice, system, adaptation, and application. In this model, bodhicitta serves as the moral foundation; theory provides guidance; practice forms the cultivation path; the system sustains continuity; adaptation ensures relevance; and application extends the model’s social function. The study concludes that this model offers a feasible framework for strengthening sustainable ethical cultivation in modern Chinese Buddhism and for extending the contemporary relevance of bodhisattva precepts in both religious and socially engaged contexts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal of TCI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information on Open Access, copyright and permissions.
References
Chiu, T.-L. (2019). Bodhisattva precepts and their compatibility with vinaya in contemporary Chinese Buddhism: A Cross-Straits comparative study. Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies, 17, 193–224.
Dhakhwa, S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals and Buddha’s teachings. Historical Journal, 12(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.3126/hj.v12i1.35443
Itharat, A., Takahashi, T., Singh, R. G., Singh, R. B., Krisentu, K., Lobenberg, R., Noguchi, H., Jantan, I., Telessy, G. I., Wilson, D. W., Shastun, S., Buttar, H. S., Elkilany, G., Hristova, K., Cornélissen, G., Hussain, L., Sulaeman, A., Singh, M., & Srivastav, R. K. (2017). Holistic approaches for health education and health promotion. World Heart Journal, 9(1), 81–96.
Lin, P.-Y. (2017). The doctrinal evolution of formless precepts in the early Chan tradition: The theory of mind purification in the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra and the Brahmā’s Net Sūtra. In W. M. Bodiford (Ed.), Rules of engagement: Medieval traditions of Buddhist monastic regulation (pp. 191–216). Projekt Verlag.
Mahathanadull, S. (2018). The five precepts: Criteria and the promotion of individual and social peace. The Journal of International Association of Buddhist Universities (JIABU), 11(3), 180–193.
Mahatthanadull, S., Piyabhani, V. P. N., Neminda, V., Anh Tuan, V. N., Tshering, V. U., Thanaboripat, D., & Mahatthanadull, S. (2024). A theory of Buddhism integration for sustainable development of wisdom and virtue in the 21st century [Research report]. Buddhist Research Institute, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.
Peng, R. (2016). A study on bodhisattva precepts (Doctoral dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University).
彭瑞花. (2016).《菩萨戒的研究》 (哲学博士论文, 陕西师范大学).
Piyabhani, P. N., & Mahatthanadull, S. (2022). The development of systematic thinking based on a Buddhist approach in the 21st century. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 5105–5111.
Pinnawala, S. (2019). The Buddhist perspective on measuring wellbeing and happiness in sustainable development. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(3), 243–248.
Shi, X. (2016). To discuss practice meaningfulness of Buddhist doctrine through three sets of pure precepts in the Sīla chapter of Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra. In Collection of college students’ dissertations 2016 (pp. 1–17). Huayan Lotus Institute.
释修畅. (2016).《瑜伽师地论·戒品》的“三聚净戒”论佛教义学的实践意义. 收入《大专学生佛学论文集2016》(页1–17). 华严莲社.
Singh, R. B., Mojto, V., Fedacko, J., Buttar, H. S., Singal, P. K., Singh, J., & Kumar, K. (2019). Practicing the eightfold path of the Buddha could modify unhealthy behaviors and reduce non-communicable diseases to advance the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A mini review. World Heart Journal, 11(1), 79–91.
Ugwu, C. N., & Eze, V. H. U. (2023). Qualitative research. IDOSR Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 20–35.
Xia, D. (2020). Notions of bodhisattva precepts in the ideological trends of Humanistic Buddhism: An investigative focus on Master Taixu. In M. Fa & G. Cheng (Eds.), 2019 Master Hsing Yun’s Humanistic Buddhism: Theory and practice research (pp. 164–181). Fo Guang Cultural Enterprise; Fo Guang Shan Institute of Humanistic Buddhism.
夏德美. (2020). 人间佛教思潮中的菩萨戒思想:以太虚为中心的考察. 收入妙凡、程恭让(主编),《2019星云大师人间佛教理论实践研究》(页164–181). 佛光文化事业有限公司;财团法人佛光山人间佛教研究院.
Yifa. (2005). From the Chinese vinaya tradition to Chan regulations: Continuity and adaptation. In W. M. Bodiford (Ed.), Going forth: Visions of Buddhist vinaya (pp. 124–135). University of Hawai‘i Press.