The Curriculum Evaluation on Mater of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction (New Curriculum 2015) Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts Nakhonratchasima College

Authors

  • Padung Petsuk คณะศึกษาศาสตร์และศิลปศาสตร์ วิทยาลัยนครราชสีมา

Keywords:

Keywords: curriculum evaluation, the CIPP model of evaluation, curriculum and instruction program

Abstract

The research objectives were 1) to evaluate the master of education program in curriculum and instruction (new curriculum 2015) 2) to study the guidelines for the development of the master of education program in curriculum and instruction (new curriculum 2015). 63 people in the academic year 2018. The CIPP evaluation model with dimensions was assessed four aspects; context, input, process and product. The data were collected through a curriculum evaluation form, an evaluation form for student learning in professional experience training, a student characteristics evaluation form for teaching professional experience, a curriculum satisfaction questionnaire, a questionnaire for satisfaction with curriculum administration, and the group conversation recording form. Data analyze was carried out through mean ​​and standard deviation for the quantitative data, and content analysis for qualitative data.
The research results were as follows:
The overall curriculum evaluation results: the context was a high level and there was an inconsistency, the input was a high level and consistent opinions, the process was a high level and consistent opinions, and the product; 1) the student learning outcomes in the teaching experience of teachers was a high level and consistent opinions, 2) the characteristics of students in the teaching experience of teachers was a high level and consistent opinions, 3) the satisfaction with the master of education program in curriculum and instruction (new curriculum 2015) was a high level and consistent opinions.

References

นิธิดา อดิภัทรนันท์. (2560). “การประเมินหลักสูตรศึกษาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาหลักสูตรการสอนและเทคโนโลยีการเรียนรู้ แขนงวิชาการสอนภาษาอังกฤษ หลักสูตรปรับปรุง พ.ศ.2555 คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่”. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (ฉบับภาษาไทย สาขามนุษยศาสตร์ สังคมศาสตร์ และศิลปะ). 10(1) (มกราคม–เมษายน 2560). หน้า 709-720.

สำนักมาตรฐานและประเมินผลอุดมศึกษา สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2553). มาตรฐานการอุดมศึกษาและเกณฑ์มาตรฐานที่เกี่ยวข้อง. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 6. กรุงเทพฯ: ห้างหุ้นส่วนจำกัด ภาพพิมพ์.

Alkin, M. C.. (2004). Evaluation Roots : Tracking Theorists’ Views and Influences. Thous and Oaks, CA : Sage.

Felix, J. L.. (1979). “Research and evaluation to Improve Instruction : The Cincinnati Strategy”. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis. 1(2), 57–62.

Matthews, J. M., & Hudson, A. M.. (2001). “Guidelines for Evaluating Parent Training Projects”. Family Relations. 50(1), 77–86.

Nicholson, T.. (1989). “Using the CIPP Model to Evaluate Reading Instruction”. Journal of Reading. 32(4), 312–318.

Ornstein, A. C. and Hunkins, F. P.. (2014). Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues. (6th Ed.). USA : Pearson Education Limited.

Saylor, J. G. and Alexander, W. M.. (1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Stufflebeam, D. L. and others. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Itasca : Ill Peacock Inc.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., and Misulis, K.. (2011). “Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs”. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 15(4), 57-84.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Petsuk, P. (2020). The Curriculum Evaluation on Mater of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction (New Curriculum 2015) Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts Nakhonratchasima College. Journal of Nakhonratchasima college (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14(1), 279–293. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsjournalnmc/article/view/239926

Issue

Section

Research Article