LEARNING MANAGEMENT MODELS IN THE DIGITAL AGE FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) Investigate the current conditions, problems, and management approaches for learning management in the digital era in secondary schools; and 2) Develop a learning management administration model for secondary schools in the digital era. A mixed-methods research design was employed. The sample consisted of 302 participants, including school administrators, heads of academic affairs, heads of curriculum, and teachers, selected through stratified random sampling. In addition, 10 experts, comprising university lecturers, educational administrators, and educational supervisors, were purposively selected to develop the proposed model. The research instruments included questionnaires, interview forms, and evaluation forms. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, and qualitative content analysis. The research findings revealed that: 1) The overall current condition of learning management administration in the digital era was at a high level ( = 4.00, S.D. = 0.90). The recommended management approaches emphasized collaboration, accessibility to digital technology, and the development of a participatory learning community through continuous engagement. and 2) The developed learning management administration model comprised five components: 1) The principles of the model, emphasizing collaboration and access to digital technology; 2) The objectives, focusing on establishing sustainable management practices and enhancing administrative quality to meet educational standards; 3) The implementation process, covering curriculum design, learning management, and assessment and evaluation; 4) The evaluation of the model, focusing on both implementation processes and stakeholder satisfaction; and 5) The success conditions, including a strong support system, personnel competency, and continuous professional learning. The overall evaluation of the model indicated that it was rated at the highest level in terms of appropriateness, feasibility, and usefulness. (
= 4.61, S.D. = 0.53).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2554). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 9). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สุวีริยาสาส์น.
พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ. (2542). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 116 ตอนที่ 74 ก หน้า 1-23 (19 สิงหาคม 2542).
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560 - 2579. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2563). สภาวะการศึกษาไทย ปี 2561 - 2562. การปฏิรูปการศึกษาในยุคดิจิทัล. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: Knowledge, confidence, and beliefs: How are they related? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change. (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Redecker, C. & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment: Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-96.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education - A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris: UNESCO.
