DEVELOPING A MANAGEMENT EXCELLENCE MODEL FOR THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION PROMOTION GROUP AT RAJAMANGALAUNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Main Article Content

Phumiphawit Thiptheerasawet
Chakrit Ponathong
Chatupol Yongsorn

Abstract

This research article aimed to: 1) Examine the components of management for excellence in the technology development and innovation promotion group of Rajamangala University of Technology; 2) Develop a management model for excellence; and 3) Formulate policy recommendations for implementing the model. The study employed a mixed-methods research and development design comprising three phases: documentary analysis, interviews with nine purposively selected executives, and a questionnaire survey of 370 personnel; the development and evaluation of a draft model by nine experts and 45 practitioners; and the evaluation of policy recommendations by five experts. The research instruments consisted of a semi-structured interview form, a component questionnaire, a model evaluation form, and a policy recommendation evaluation form. Data were analyzed using content analysis, descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, Varimax rotation, and a criterion-referenced mean test. In this study, excellence in the context of the technology development and innovation promotion group refers to the university’s capability to generate practical outcomes in technology and innovation, such as patents, intellectual property, technology transfer, commercialization, collaboration with partners, and outcomes for learners, communities, and industries. The findings revealed that: 1) Management for excellence consisted of nine components, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.86, Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistically significant at the .001 level, a cumulative variance explained of 52.584 percent, and an overall reliability coefficient of 0.91; 2) The developed model was systematic, with suitability and feasibility rated at a high level; and 3) The policy recommendations emphasized a central data system, monitoring mechanisms, a research and innovation ecosystem, collaboration with partners, outcome-based resource allocation, and impact measurement to promote sustainable university excellence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thiptheerasawet, P. ., Ponathong, C. ., & Yongsorn, C. . (2026). DEVELOPING A MANAGEMENT EXCELLENCE MODEL FOR THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION PROMOTION GROUP AT RAJAMANGALAUNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 13(7), 24–36. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/301312
Section
Research Articles

References

กฎกระทรวงการจัดกลุ่มสถาบันอุดมศึกษา พ.ศ. 2564. (2564). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 138 ตอนพิเศษ 97 ง หน้า 1-7 (30 เมษายน 2564).

Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

European Foundation for Quality Management. (2019). The EFQM Model. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://efqm.org/the-efqm-model/

Hair, J. et aI. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/auhF8

Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Reshaping the World Order of Higher Education: The Role and Impact of Rankings on National and Global Systems. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 4-31.

International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 56002:2019 Innovation Management-Innovation Management System-Guidance. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Marginson, S. (2016). The Worldwide Trend to High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics of Social Stratification in Inclusive Systems. Higher Education, 72, 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Baldrige Excellence Framework. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/zBfNk

OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. (4th ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.

Teece, D. J. et al. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: technology in education: a tool on whose terms?. Paris: UNESCO.