A COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT MODEL OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ACCORDING TO THE 21ST CENTURY EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONCEPT OF THE SCHOOL UNDER THE MUNICIPALITY PHANG NGA PROVINCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to 1) Analyze the components of 21st-century school administrator competency enhancement, 2) Create a model for 21st-century school administrator competency enhancement, and 3) Examine the model for 21st-century school administrator competency enhancement. A mixed-methods research design was used. Five key informants were school administrators and principals. The sample consisted of 90 teachers and chairpersons of basic education school boards, selected using purposive sampling based on the Krejcie-Morgan table. Nine experts and qualified individuals participated in expert-based seminars and nine participants in focus group discussions, also selected using purposive sampling. The research instruments included questionnaires, interviews, and model evaluation forms. The questionnaire had a reliability coefficient of 0.911. Statistical analysis included mean and standard deviation. The research findings revealed that 1) The eight main components of 21st-century school administrator competency enhancement were: leadership, interpersonal skills, organizational management, policy and strategy management, curriculum and instruction management, administrative management, finance and budget management, general administration, and personnel management. The overall average score for the components of 21st-century school administrator competency enhancement was 4.60. 2) The development of a model for enhancing 21st-century school administrator competencies incorporates five principles: participatory management, mission integration, competency enhancement, organizational culture promotion, and sustainability development. and 3) Seminars and focus group discussions revealed three limitations in implementing this model: 1) A shared vision and goals for competency development; 2) Consideration of its suitability to the school context; and 3) Reinforcement of learning and development to equip school administrators with the competencies to improve educational quality.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
นุชนรา รัตนศิระประภา. (2557). สมรรถนะของผู้บริหารที่ส่งผลต่อคุณลักษณะโรงเรียนมาตรฐานสากล สังกัดสำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. วารสารวิชาการ Veridian E-Journal, 7(3), 507-528.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560 - 2579. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.
อาภรณ์ ภู่วิทยพันธุ์. (2567). การออกแบบเส้นทางความก้าวหน้าในสายอาชีพ ภาคปฏิบัติ (CAREER PATH DEVELOPMEMT DESIGN IN PRACTICE). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching Smart People How to Learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99-109.
English, F. W. (2015). The SAGE guide to educational leadership and management. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hoyle, J. R. et al. (2005). Educational Administration: Leadership in Schools. Boston: Pearson Education.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Leithwood, K. A. & Jantzi, D. (2005). A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996 - 2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 227-253.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.
Thompson, A. A. & Strickland, A. J. (2003). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Boston: McGraw-Hill.