APPROACHES TO INTEGRATING ESG INTO INTERNATIONAL CURRICULA: DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE LEARNING UNIT TO PROMOTE EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aimed to 1) Investigate the needs, readiness, current conditions, and desirable conditions for integrating ESG concepts into an international curriculum; 2) Analyze approaches for ESG integration in order to develop a prototype learning unit to promote sustainable learning; and 3) Examine the effects of the prototype learning unit on students’ knowledge and understanding, attitudes, behaviors, and satisfaction. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology conducted in three phases: preliminary data investigation, the development of ESG integration guidelines and a prototype learning unit, and the implementation of the prototype with a sample group of 30 students with purposive sampling. The research instruments included an ESG knowledge test, an attitude assessment form, a learning behavior evaluation form, and a student satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Dependent Samples t-test. The findings revealed that 1) teachers and administrators were aware of and recognized the importance of integrating ESG concepts into learning management, with a high level of readiness for implementation. However, clearer guidelines were still needed regarding curriculum design, teacher development, and assessment methods. 2) The study also found that ESG integration should be systematically implemented through learning activities connected to real-world contexts in order to promote sustainable learning. 3) The implementation of the prototype learning unit showed that students’ ESG knowledge and understanding scores after the intervention were significantly higher than before the intervention at the .001 level. In addition, students demonstrated high to very high levels of attitudes and learning behaviors related to sustainability, and their overall satisfaction with the learning activities was at a very high level ( = 4.75, S.D. = 0.43). These findings indicate that the prototype learning unit effectively promotes sustainable learning and can be effectively applied within international curriculum contexts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bamrungsetthapong, S. (2025). Education for green society: Approaches to developing Thai education toward sustainability. Wisdom Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(9), 20-32.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. (4th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Eccles, R. G. et al. (2020). The social origins of ESG: An analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619888994
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC. Retrieved February 12, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/DuYo0
Kearins, K. & Springett, D. (2003). Educating for sustainability: Developing critical skills. Journal of Management Education, 27(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903251411
Khan, M. et al. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lozano, R. et al. (2019). Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: Assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches. Sustainability, 11(6), 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061602
Manopattanakron, K. et al. (2022). A comparative study of promoting education for sustainable development under Sustainable Development Goal 4 in Thailand, Japan, and Canada. Community and Social Development Journal, 23(2), 65-84.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
Rieckmann, M. (2021). Education for sustainable development and the development of sustainability competencies. Retrieved February 21, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/48nIB
Shobha. (2025). Shaping sustainability attitude: The role of environmental education among students. International Journal of Advanced Academic Studies, 7(5), 48-50. https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2025.v7.i5a.1451
Sibbel, A. (2009). Pathways towards sustainability through higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910 925262
Stubbs, W. & Schapper, J. (2011). Two approaches to curriculum development for educating for sustainability and CSR. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111148045
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Retrieved March 1, 2026, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved January 26, 2026, from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Wiek, A. et al. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Wiek, A. et al. (2014). Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability programs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2013-0013
Yu, H. et al. (2022). Application of an environmental, social and governance course to enhance the knowledge of sustainable finance of international Chinese college students in Thailand. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i11.5411