Dynamics of Digital Currency Adoption in China: Exploring Technological, Policy, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Dimensions

ผู้แต่ง

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2025.286767

คำสำคัญ:

Digital Currency, DCEP, Blockchain, Financial Inclusion, Government Policies, China, Adoption Dynamics

บทคัดย่อ

Background and Aim: China’s Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) system represents a pioneering shift in global finance, positioning China at the forefront of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) innovation. While existing literature explores various aspects of digital currency adoption, an integrative analysis of technological, policy, economic, and socio-cultural dimensions remains limited. This study seeks to bridge this research gap by examining the key determinants of DCEP adoption and its broader global implications. By incorporating insights from multiple disciplines, this research enhances understanding of adoption frameworks and strategic policy interventions.

Materials and Methods: This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining primary and secondary data sources to analyze DCEP adoption dynamics. Primary data includes surveys (n=500 respondents) and semi-structured interviews with policymakers, financial institutions, and technology experts. Secondary data is drawn from government reports, central bank publications, financial institutions, and peer-reviewed academic literature. The quantitative component applies statistical modeling to measure transaction cost reduction, financial inclusion, and regulatory compliance, while the qualitative component explores policy initiatives, socio-cultural influences, and technological trust. This methodological design ensures analytical transparency and a comprehensive assessment of factors shaping digital currency adoption in China.

Results: With blockchain technology as its backbone, DCEP enhances transaction security, efficiency, and transparency, fostering positive user perceptions. However, challenges such as regulatory clarity, financial literacy, and consumer trust significantly impact adoption rates. Empirical findings reveal disparities in adoption levels across different demographic groups and industries, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study identifies key socio-cultural factors, including trust in state-backed financial systems, digital literacy, and evolving consumer behaviors, as critical to DCEP adoption success.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the necessity of a comprehensive strategy that integrates technological innovations, regulatory reforms, and financial education to accelerate digital currency adoption. This study contributes to the broader discourse on financial technology by offering insights into policy frameworks, economic incentives, and consumer behavior. The research provides strategic recommendations for ensuring inclusive adoption while addressing privacy concerns, regulatory risks, and financial stability. As China advances its digital financial ecosystem, its experience offers valuable lessons for other nations exploring CBDCs. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies and comparative assessments to evaluate the long-term impact of digital currency adoption frameworks.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Williams, M. D. (2018). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk, and self-efficacy. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(1), 118–139.

Arakcheeva, M. (2019). General characteristics of the financial markets in the People’s Republic of China. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 7(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2019-7-1-44-56

Arner, D. W., Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Didenko, A. N. (2020). After Libra, digital yuan and COVID-19: Central bank digital currencies and the new world of money and payment systems. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622311

Auer, R., & Böhme, R. (2021). Central bank digital currencies: The quest for minimally invasive technology. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 193–210.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chen, Y., & Qian, X. (2021). A comparative analysis of the legal regulation of digital currencies in China and abroad. Law and Finance Journal, 11, 45–58.

Chen, Y., Chen, Z., & Hu, D. (2021, April). The reconstruction of the accounting information disclosure system based on blockchain technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1883(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1883/1/012085

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Didenko, A. N., Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). After Libra, digital yuan and COVID-19: Central bank digital currencies and the new world of money and payment systems. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622311

Echarte Fernández, M. Á., Náñez Alonso, S. L., Jorge-Vázquez, J., & Reier Forradellas, R. F. (2021). Central banks’ monetary policy in the face of the COVID-19 economic crisis: Monetary stimulus and the emergence of CBDCs. Sustainability, 13(8), 4242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084242

Goodell, G., & Al-Nakib, H. D. (2021). The development of central bank digital currency in China: An analysis (KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series). KDI School of Public Policy and Management. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906204

Huang, Y., & Wong, J. (2020). Exploring digital literacy and its impact on rural communities in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 110–119.

Ji, Z., Abuselidze, G., & Lymar, V. (2021). Currency internationalization and reforms in the architecture of the monetary system: The case of digital yuan. Studies of Applied Economics, 40(1).

Jung, H., & Jeong, D. (2021). Blockchain implementation method for interoperability between CBDCs. Future Internet, 13(5), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13050133

Ključnikov, A., Mura, L., & Sklenár, D. (2020). Information security management in SMEs: Factors of adoption. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 1780–1795.

Kutia, S., Chauhdary, S. H., Iwendi, C., Liu, L., Yong, W., & Bashir, A. K. (2019). Socio-technological factors affecting users’ adoption of eHealth functionalities: A case study of China and Ukraine eHealth systems. IEEE Access, 7, 90777–90788. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924584

Li, J., & Wang, M. (2022). The impact of digital currency on financial inclusion: Evidence from China’s DCEP pilot. Journal of Digital Economy, 3(2), 34–46.

Louie, B. L., & Wang, M. (2021). China’s forthcoming digital currency: Implications for foreign companies and financial institutions in China. Journal of Investment Compliance, 22(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-04-2021-0017

Luo, Y., Zhang, L., & Ma, X. (2021). Digital literacy and digital currency adoption: A survey in Chinese rural regions. Journal of Financial Innovation, 9(3), 58–72.

Müller, J., & Kerényi, Á. (2022). The rise of central bank digital currencies. Financial and Economic Review, 21(3), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.3.122

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.

Twarowska, K. (2019). Reforms of China’s exchange rate regime and the renminbi internationalization. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 18(4), 531–556. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=877494

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Wang, H., & Gao, S. (2024). The future of the international financial system: The emerging CBDC network and its impact on regulation. Regulation & Governance, 18(1), 288–306.

Wei, Y., Abdul Jamal, A. A., & Mohidin, R. A. (2023). Understanding users’ behavioral intention to use the digital currency electronic payment in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10), 123–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i10/18851

Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

Xu, J., & Prud’homme, D. (2020). China’s digital currency revolution and implications for international business strategy. London School of Economics Business Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18819.94240

Yang, L. (2023). Research on legal issues of digital currency. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(16), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.061625

Zhang, T. (2021). Impacts of digital currency electronic payment (DCEP) on China’s banking system. In Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.529

Zhang, Y., & Qin, J. (2021). Research on the characteristics and international influence of digital RMB (DCEP). 2021 16th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE51940.2021.9569382

Zhao, Y., Deebhijarn, S., Taghipour, A., Ahadi, N., & Norkaew, O. (2019). A comparative study of the national strategic plan between Thailand and China of the Ministry of Industry. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 2(5), 557–567.

Zou, L. (2021). Digital currencies and relevant policy analysis. Research in Economics and Management, 6(2), 88–96.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2025-11-23

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Luo, C., Nunthasen, K. ., Nunthasen, W. ., & Sinnarong, N. . (2025). Dynamics of Digital Currency Adoption in China: Exploring Technological, Policy, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Dimensions. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 5(6), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2025.286767

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิชาการ