https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/issue/feedInterdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal 2026-01-04T08:38:59+07:00Asst. Prof. Dr. Sanya Kenaphoomdr.keninstitute@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<div><strong>Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal</strong></div> <div><strong>Old ISSN 2774-0374 (Online): New ISSN 2985-2749 (Online)</strong></div> <div><strong>Crossref Member name: Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion<br />DOI prefix (Crossref): 10.60027</strong></div> <div><strong>Doi Prefix (DataCite): 10.14456</strong></div> <div> <h1><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iq97FmQkaGOzJzXTsxJifq00vBXdIYxRK2zTn828KKM/edit#heading=h.tzb9xiqmpay7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ThaiJO User Manual</a> </h1> </div> <div> <div><strong>Warning</strong></div> <div> <p data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">Currently, there are scammers claiming to be able to contact journals to issue publication receipts. The journal would like to inform authors that we will only provide the Acceptance Letter in electronic form by DR.KEN Institute of Academic Development and Promotion from E-mail: dr.keninstitute@gmail.com. And if the author's affiliated organization wishes to recheck (Must do), please contact the journal's email: E-mail: dr.keninstitute@gmail.com, so that the journal will promptly respond.</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> </span>Note: </strong>Please do not trust anyone claiming to be able to contact the journal to provide the Acceptance Letter. Our journal strictly follows TCI policies and standards. All articles submitted will go through the Review process according to the Peer Review policy until the process is complete, then the Acceptance Letter can be issued.</p> </div> </div> <div> </div> <div><strong>Publishing Policy - Aims and Scope</strong></div> <div>This journal aims to publish research articles, academic articles, review articles, and book reviews in the scope of;</div> <div> <p><strong><em>-General Social Sciences</em></strong> were Anthropology (cultural, biological, linguistic, archaeology), Sociology (theory, inequality, demography), Political Science (comparative, theory, IR, public admin), Human Geography (cultural, economic, political), Economics (micro, macro, development), Social Psychology, Communication & Media Studies, Education (sociology & policy).<br /><em><strong>-Apply Social Sciences</strong></em> were Criminology, Social Work, Public Policy, International Development, Urban & Regional Planning, Human Resource Management, Counseling & Community Services, Gender & Cultural Studies, Public Health, Health Policy & Management, Health Education & Promotion, Community Health, Epidemiology (Social Perspective), Health Communication, Medical Sociology, Mental Health Services, Sports Management, Sports Psychology, Physical Education, Exercise & Fitness Science, Rehabilitation & Sports Therapy, Coaching & Performance Analysis, Sports Sociology, Event & Facility Management.<br /><em><strong>-Educations</strong></em> were Educational Policy & Leadership, Curriculum & Instruction, Educational Psychology, Special & Inclusive Education, Adult & Continuing Education, Comparative & International Education, Sociology of Education, Teacher Education & Professional Development.<br /><strong><em>-Public Administrations</em></strong> were Public Policy Analysis, Public Sector Management, Governance & Institutional Development, Fiscal Administration & Public Finance, Human Resource Management in Government, E-Government & Digital Governance, Nonprofit & NGO Management, Public Service Ethics & Accountability. <br /><em><strong>-Business Administrations</strong></em> were Management & Leadership, Marketing, Finance & Accounting, Operations & Supply Chain Management, Human Resource Management, Entrepreneurship & Innovation, Strategic Management, and International Business.<br /><strong><em>-Political Sciences</em> </strong>were Public Policy & Governance, International Relations & Diplomacy, Comparative Politics, Political Economy, Political Communication, Public Administration, Security & Strategic Studies, Peace & Conflict Resolution<br /><strong><em>-Religion and Philosophy</em></strong> were Ethics & Applied Philosophy, Philosophy of Law & Politics, Religious Education, Comparative Religion, Interfaith Dialogue & Peacebuilding, Philosophy of Science & Technology, Bioethics & Environmental Ethics, Spiritual Counseling & Community Leadership<br /><strong><em>-Developments</em> </strong>were International Development, Community Development, Rural & Urban Development, Sustainable Development, Economic Development Planning, Social Policy & Development, Capacity Building & Institutional Strengthening, Monitoring & Evaluation of Development Programs<br /><strong><em>-Laws</em> </strong>were Criminal Law & Criminology, Civil & Commercial Law, Constitutional & Administrative Law, International Law, Human Rights Law, Environmental Law, Labour & Employment Law, Legal Studies & Jurisprudence<br /><em><strong>-Linguistics</strong> </em>were Applied Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, Language Education & TESOL, Translation & Interpretation, Computational Linguistics, Language Policy & Planning, Forensic Linguistics. <br /><strong><em>-Social Interdisciplinary Areas</em></strong> were Gender & Sexuality Studies, Cultural Studies, Environmental Studies, Peace & Conflict Studies, Global & Area Studies, Public Health (Social Science Perspective), Science, Technology & Society (STS), Migration & Diaspora Studies.</p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">Articles to be considered for publication have been reviewed by at least 2 peer reviewers (Double-Blind Peer Review) and published in both Thai and English.</span></p> </div> <div>Views and opinions appearing in articles published in The Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal are the responsibility of the authors of the articles and not the views of the editors. The Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal does not reserve any copyrights. But give references to show the source. </div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <p><strong>Type of Articles</strong></p> <p>1. A Research Article is a report of the results of a systematic study, research, or development.</p> <p>2. An Academic Article is a work of writing an interesting topic in which the author presents new knowledge by using theories, concepts, and related research results as information sources.</p> <p>3. A Review Article is an article that combines theories, concepts, and research results on many subjects, the author will synthesize the literature in order to compile it into a conclusion or argument on a particular matter, which is a review of the academic progress of that matter.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Guidelines on AI-Generated Content</strong></p> <p>IARJ acknowledges the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate information that can be helpful for articles submitted to the journal for prospective publication. However, the journal also recognizes the need to ensure that AI-generated content is managed sensibly and morally.<br />This policy describes the journal's guidelines for using AI-generated content in published articles.<br />1. Definition of AI-generated content<br />For this policy, any content created or substantially modified by an AI system is referred to as AI-generated content. This includes both content created wholly by an AI system and content authored by a human author that has undergone substantial AI system alteration.<br />2. Principles<br />IARJ will only publish AI-generated content that complies with the following rules:<br />* The AI system that produced the content cannot be recognized as one of the authors when it is submitted for potential publication.<br />* The AI system used to generate the content must be properly described in the article.<br />* The human author's contribution to the content must be acknowledged.<br />* The AI-generated content must be original and not plagiarized.<br />* The AI-generated content must be accurate and reliable.<br />* The AI-generated content must not mislead or deceive readers.<br />3. Procedure<br />Authors who wish to submit articles with AI-generated content must provide IARJ with the following information:<br />* A detailed description of the AI system used to generate the content.<br />* A copy of the original input data used to generate the content.<br />* A copy of the AI-generated content.<br />* A statement acknowledging the human author's contribution to the content.<br />IARJ will evaluate the AI-generated content and decide if it is suitable for publication.<br />4. Enforcement<br />IARJ reserves the right to<strong> reject</strong> or retract any article <strong>(Retraction)</strong> that does not comply with this policy.</p> <p><strong>Article Retraction Policy</strong><br />An article that has previously been published gets retracted when it is taken out of a journal. The editor and/or editorial board of the journal may decide on this. Small editorial mistakes don't lead to retractions. In this instance, an article would be updated. Retractions reveal more significant problems with a piece of writing. Retractions may occur because of<br />- Errors in the research<br />- Issues with the reproducibility of the research<br />- Plagiarism<br />- Falsification of data or results<br />- Fabrication of data or results<br />- Copyright infringement<br />- Failure to disclose a conflict of interest<br />- No institutional review board approval for research on human subjects or animals.</p> </div> <div><strong>Publication Frequency</strong></div> <div>Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is a bimonthly journal (6 issues per year)</div> <div>Issue 1 January-February</div> <div>Issue 2 March-April</div> <div>Issue 3 May-June</div> <div>Issue 4 July-August</div> <div>Issue 5 September-October</div> <div>Issue 6 November-December</div>https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/article/view/288283The Role of School Administrators in the Implementation of the Student Care and Support System of Schools Under the Office of Special Education Administration, Northeastern Region2025-04-13T19:33:44+07:00Kritsada Phaphromteenkuni@gmail.comPrommin Srimuenwaiporm0704.2503@gmail.comSomdet Sawandeedad.sawan1@gmail.com<p><strong>Background and Aims:</strong> The Thai education system today faces numerous challenges due to the rapid advancement of Thai society in various aspects, particularly in the areas of economy, culture, and technology, all of which have become increasingly influential in the lives of children and youth. The progress of science and technology has brought about significant changes in many areas. The student support system is an educational process within schools that focuses on promotion, prevention, and problem-solving, aiming to enhance the quality of life and development of every student. The objective of this research is to study and compare the level of opinions of personnel regarding the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region, classified by education level and position. Additionally, the research aims to explore ways to develop the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region.</p> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong> The sample group used in this research consisted of 330 personnel from schools under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Special Education Administration in the Northeastern region. The sample size was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s sampling table, followed by stratified random sampling. The research instruments included a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire with an Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.80 to 1.00, and a reliability coefficient of 0.81, as well as a structured interview. The statistical methods used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and F-test.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The study findings revealed the following: 1. The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools is overall at a high level (= 4.38; S.D.= 0.42). 2. The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region, when classified by education level and position, showed significant statistical differences at the .05 level. And 3. The development guidelines for the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region indicate that there should be systematic monitoring and data collection on students' health and behavior. A variety of screening methods should be used to classify students into normal, at-risk, or problematic groups. Special support should be provided for students with exceptional abilities, and appropriate activities should be promoted. Opportunities should be given for students to participate and take leadership roles in organizing activities. The use of technology in providing timely counseling and support for students should be encouraged, and information should be used to refer students with serious problems to experts, with continuous follow-up.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system is overall at a high level, with significant statistical differences based on education level and position. The development guidelines suggest systematically monitoring students' health and behavior data, utilizing technology and information systems for counseling, and referring students with serious problems to experts, with continuous follow-up.</p>2026-01-04T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IARJ/article/view/288554The Promotion of Moral and Ethical Conduct Among Teachers and Educational Personnel under the Nakhon Ratchasima Secondary Educational Service Area Office2025-04-22T06:59:54+07:00Kittiphong Patthumkittipongpudtum001@gmail.comWasin SonpoWasin.son1960@gmail.comPradit Chatcharatkoonpradit_chat@hotmail.com<p><strong>Background and Aims:</strong> Morality and ethics are considered fundamental principles for every human being. Morality serves as a key guideline for individuals or society to apply in their daily lives. It helps individuals perform their duties smoothly, achieve success in their work, and become good members of their families, society, and the nation. For teachers, morality must go hand in hand with the profession; a teacher without morality is like a monk without precepts. Morality is a fundamental aspect for everyone and all professions. This research aims to: 1) Study the level of personnel’s opinions on the promotion of morality and ethics among government teachers and educational personnel, and 2) Compare the levels of those opinions, categorized by educational level, work experience, and position, within the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nakhon Ratchasima. Additionally, it seeks to explore approaches for promoting morality and ethics among government teachers and educational personnel under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office in Nakhon Ratchasima.</p> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong> The sample group used in this research consisted of school administrators, teachers, and educational personnel under the Nakhon Ratchasima Secondary Educational Service Area Office. The sample of 351 individuals was selected using stratified random sampling. The research instruments included a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and a structured interview. The Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) ranged from 0.80 to 1.00, and the reliability coefficient was 0.84. The statistical methods used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, F-test (ANOVA), and pairwise comparison using Scheffé’s method.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> The research findings revealed that: 1. The overall level of promoting morality and ethics among teachers and educational personnel under the Nakhon Ratchasima Secondary Educational Service Area Office was rated as high. When considering each aspect individually, the promotion of morality and ethics in all areas was also rated at a high level. 2. The promotion of morality and ethics, when classified by educational background, work experience, and job position, showed statistically significant differences at the .05 level. 3. Guidelines for promoting morality and ethics among teachers and educational personnel under the Nakhon Ratchasima Secondary Educational Service Area Office were identified as follows: safeguarding national independence and sovereignty; adhering to religious principles and respecting religious diversity; conducting oneself within moral boundaries; performing duties with a strong sense of responsibility, considering the benefit of the public service and relevant stakeholders; developing work systematically; applying modern technology and engaging in continuous self-development to achieve targeted outcomes; providing services willingly; treating everyone equally and respectfully; being a good citizen who respects the law, maintains discipline, and upholds professional standards; using polite language; listening attentively to others' opinions; and practicing compassion.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The promotion of morality and ethics among teachers and educational personnel focuses on instilling positive values, honesty, and a strong sense of duty. It emphasizes being a good role model for students and society, as well as working with transparency and accountability. Activities such as training sessions, awareness-building programs, and continuous evaluations are organized to foster and develop professional ethics in the teaching profession.</p>2026-01-05T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal