Factors Influencing Ecosystem of Ideological-political Education in China Universities

บทคัดย่อ

Background and Aims: The section currently introduces the topic of ideological-political education, but lacks a clear, concise statement of the research objective. It should highlight the main purpose of the study and what it aims to achieve in the context of ideological-political education in Chinese universities. For instance, a sentence such as “This study aims to examine the factors influencing the ideological-political education ecosystem in Chinese universities by employing SWOT analysis” would provide clarity from the outset.

Methodology: The section mentions both quantitative and qualitative methods, but this could be explained more explicitly. A clearer description of the methodological approach should be included, specifying how data were collected and analyzed. For example, stating, “This study utilized both quantitative data collected through surveys and qualitative insights from interviews to assess the four elements of the SWOT model” would help the reader understand the dual approach more effectively.

Results: (1) While the section touches upon some results, it should focus more on key findings. These should be presented more succinctly, summarizing both the strengths (e.g., “the availability of resources”) and weaknesses (e.g., “limited access to data”). This ensures that the reader can quickly grasp the study's main outcomes. Including a sentence such as, “The results indicate that while Chinese universities benefit from abundant resources, challenges such as limited data access pose significant threats to the sustainability of ideological-political education,” would strengthen the abstract. (2) The section contains several redundancies and overly complex phrases, which could be simplified for better readability. For instance, the phrase “the manipulation of the Ideological-political education ecosystem on consequence on education” could be streamlined to “the impact of the ideological-political education ecosystem on student outcomes.” This change not only improves clarity but also makes the text more accessible. (3) There are some inconsistencies in the terms used, such as “Ideological-political education ecosystem” and “ecosystem influential factors.” It is essential to maintain consistency in terminology throughout the abstract to avoid confusion. Stick to one clear term, such as “ideological-political education ecosystem,” and use it consistently. (4) The section ends somewhat abruptly and could benefit from a more conclusive final sentence that encapsulates the study's overall importance. A sentence like “This study provides valuable insights into strengthening the ideological-political education ecosystem in Chinese universities, with implications for policy reform and future research” would offer a stronger conclusion.

Conclusion: The findings show that although Chinese universities have a wealth of resources, they also face obstacles that make ideological-political education less sustainable, such as restricted access to data. The impact of the abstract would be increased and clarity would be improved by adding a concluding sentence, making sure terminology is consistent, and simplifying complex phrases.