Effects of Microteaching Combined with Questioning Techniques on the Mathematics Teaching Ability of Student Teachers at Zhoukou Normal University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e298218

Keywords:

Mathematics Teaching Theory Course, Questioning Techniques, Mathematics Teaching Ability, Student Teachers' Satisfaction, Microteaching

Abstract

Background and Aims: As basic education reform in China continues to deepen, expectations for teachers' teaching abilities have increased. As normal universities that train teachers for basic education, they face limitations in traditional teaching models and can no longer meet the needs of cultivating high-quality student teachers. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of Microteaching combined with Questioning Techniques in improving the mathematics teaching ability of third-year Student Teachers majoring in mathematics at Zhoukou Normal University, and to assess whether the intervention can help Student Teachers meet the 70% mastery criterion.

Methodology: This quasi-experimental study adopts a one-group post-test design, and 20 third-year student teachers majoring in mathematics from Zhoukou Normal University are selected as the research subjects through cluster sampling. Implement teaching interventions that Microteaching integrates (pre-class preview, in-class case analysis, repeatable practice training, feedback, and reflection) and Questioning Techniques (question chains, timely questioning). The intervention lasts for 7 weeks with a total of 21 class hours, covering modules related to mathematics teaching abilities (design, implementation, reflection, evaluation). The study collected data through a mathematics teaching ability rubric assessment form and a satisfaction questionnaire, and used SPSS software to conduct descriptive statistics and a one-sample t-test for analysis.

Results: One-sample t-test results revealed that participants' overall teaching ability score (M = 53.55, SD = 5.23, out of 64) was significantly higher than the preset 70% criterion score (44.8), t =7.49, p < .01, Cohen’s d = 1.67, indicating a large effect size. Scores across all four sub-dimensions also significantly exceeded the criterion. Moreover, participants reported high levels of course satisfaction (M = 61.15, SD = 4.86, out of 75), significantly surpassing the 70% criterion (52.5), t = 7.96, p < .01, with all sub-dimensions meeting or exceeding the threshold. These findings suggest that the intervention successfully achieved its intended outcomes in both competence enhancement and learner acceptance.

Conclusion: This study indicates that an integrated course combining Questioning Techniques is positively associated with student teachers’ attainment of teaching ability standards, and that student receptivity to this approach is favorable. The observed effectiveness may be attributed to the dual synergy between behavioral rehearsal, Microteaching, and Questioning Techniques as cognitive scaffolding—the former facilitating the automation of pedagogical ability through simulated practice and iterative feedback, the latter externalizing instructional decision-making and promoting reflective adjustment via question-driven inquiry. This study provides preliminary empirical evidence for shifting the focus of practical training in teacher education from discrete ability acquisition toward integrated competence development. The limitations of this study include: a single-group post-test design without a control group or pre-test, which limits the ability to make causal inferences; the sample is only from a single institution, and the external validity needs to be further tested in future studies by expanding the sample, adding a control group, and conducting follow-up measurements.

References

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Duan, X. N. (2019). Current status and improvement strategies of mathematics teaching theory. Journal of Luliang Institute of Education, 36(2), 1–12.

Guo, Q. S. (2022). Towards disciplinary education: The intention and mission of the Compulsory Education Mathematics Curriculum Standards (2022 edition). Research on Primary School Teaching, 23, 13–16.

He, Y. H. (2023). The application of questioning skills in psychology teaching. New Curriculum Teaching, 24, 89–90.

Iliasova, L., Nekrasova, I., Mena, J., & Estrada-Molina, O. (2025). Microteaching on pre-service teachers’ education: A literature review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562975

Jiang, H. J. (2022). Construction of influencing factors and indication system of teaching skills for master of teaching Chinese to speakers of other languages from the perspective of microteaching (Master’s thesis, Beijing International Studies University).

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002

Lauermann, F., & Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ perceived teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? A closer look at student-reported classroom processes and outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 56, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355

Li, D. (2022). Research on primary school mathematics teaching based on the theory of multiple intelligences. Mathematics Education Forum, 18(2), 44–52.

Liu, S. Y. (2023). Investigation on the teaching reflection performance of pre-service mathematics teachers in microteaching (Master’s dissertation, East China Normal University).

Park, E. (2022). The reflectivity of EFL preservice teachers in microteaching practice. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(4), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.11

Peng, B. F., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Microteaching and teaching skill training. Nanjing University Press.

Song, Y. L. (2019). A study on the teaching of practical skills of undergraduate normal students in the new era (Master’s dissertation, Fujian Normal University).

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2009). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner (Y. Liu, Trans.). China Light Industry Press. (Original work published 2005)

Yang, R. L. (2015). The practice and exploration of classroom teaching reform of “Mathematics Pedagogy”. Journal of Xinzhou Teachers College, 31(5), 1–13.

Ye, L. (2021). Formation through transformation and integration in collaborative research: On the relationship between educational theory and practice (IV). Educational Research, 42(10), 4–18.

Yue, H. J. (2021). A study on the influence of structured teaching reflection on the teaching professional ability of physics normal students (Doctoral dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University).

Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.

Zhao, Y. C. (2022). Research on the training mode of practical skills of mathematics normal students (Master’s dissertation, Central China Normal University).

Downloads

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Zhang, Y., Juithong, S., & Klangphahol, K. (2026). Effects of Microteaching Combined with Questioning Techniques on the Mathematics Teaching Ability of Student Teachers at Zhoukou Normal University. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal , 6(6), e298218. https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e298218