Mediation of Disputes Using Local Cultural Principles by Elders and Community Wise Men of Non-Buri Area, Sahasakhan District, Kalasin Province

Abstract

Background and Aims: Community-based dispute mediation is essential to restorative justice because it reduces reliance on formal judicial procedures. Traditionally, local cultural norms, belief systems, familial ties, and the moral authority of elders and community wise men have been used to resolve disputes in the non-Buri area of Sahasakhan District, Kalasin Province. These techniques emphasize reconciliation, social peace, and the restoration of links within the society rather than punishment. This study aimed to: (1) examine the current situation of dispute mediation using local cultural principles by elders and community wise men in the Non Buri area; (2) analyze strategies employed in culturally based dispute mediation; and (3) identify appropriate forms and methods of the justice process that can be adapted to align with Thai society, culture, and community-based justice systems in the study area.

Methodology: This research adopted a qualitative research approach, integrating documentary research and field studies. Through surveys, focus groups, in-depth interviews, and observations, information was gathered from local inhabitants, practitioners, government officials, and community elders. The purposive sample comprised 90 individuals, comprising 18 community-wise men, 54 community practitioners, and 18 general informants. Data were examined using descriptive and analytical approaches associated with the research aims.

Results: The results showed that community-based dispute mediation is a successful substitute method for resolving disputes, enhancing community involvement and self-management through local legal procedures. Mediation procedures were found to be integrative, incorporating kinship-based negotiation, mediation by recognized individuals or groups, and agreed-upon community standards, including compensation for transgressions. Relationship restoration, mutual understanding, and peaceful coexistence are the goals of these strategies. Furthermore, the most appropriate justice model revealed was dispute mediation based on Buddhist peaceful ways, incorporating Buddhist ideals into mediation concepts, methods, and processes.

Conclusion: According to the study's findings, community-based, conciliatory dispute resolution is widely accepted. Community capital, such as village headmen, formal and informal leaders, elders, and community volunteers who support and aid the mediation process, is crucial for effective mediation. By strengthening and assisting these local mechanisms, restorative justice outcomes can be enhanced, and long-term social harmony among communities can be promoted.