Developing a Policy Oriented for Promoting Students with Gifted Athletes toward International Excellence within the Framework of SPLISS Plus 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e296497Keywords:
Developing Policy, Students with Gifted Athletes, International ExcellenceAbstract
Background and Aims: The government has implemented a national sports development master plan led by the Ministry of Tourism and Sports, with key agencies coordinating across education, sports organizations, and the private sector. However, performance evaluations indicate that targets have not been met due to fragmented management structures, limited integration with the education system, insufficient sports science support, and weak inter-agency collaboration. Lessons from successful international talent development models, therefore, underscore the need for more effective and coordinated policies to achieve the national sports strategy's goals. Therefore, this research aims to: 1) study and analyze the current situation and needs in the development of gifted students by the National Sports University and its affiliated sports schools. The objectives of this study are: 1) to develop policies and guidelines for developing gifted athletes to international excellence in sports schools under the jurisdiction of local administrative organizations; 2) to synthesize policy models and guidelines for developing gifted athletes to international excellence in leading sports countries; and 3) to develop policies and guidelines for developing gifted athletes to international excellence within the context of Thailand.
Methodology: This study employed a research and development approach consisting of three phases: (1) a needs analysis based on the SPLISS-Plus framework conducted with sports university and sports school administrators; (2) document analysis and synthesis of sports success policy factors from 10 leading sports nations; and (3) development and quality evaluation of policies and guidelines for nurturing elite student-athletes. Research instruments included a needs assessment form (IOC = .83, Cronbach’s α = .84) and policy quality assessment tools (IOC = .92). The sample comprised 50 administrators selected through purposive sampling, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and systematic content analysis.
Results: 1) The overall mean and standard deviation of the 12 policy framework issues of SPLISS-Plus 2 were very high (\bar{x} = 4.59, SD=0.50). The top three issues with very high demand were: 1) the efficiency and quality of coaches and expert personnel (\bar{x} =4.73, SD=0.68), 2) the application of sports science and sports technology (\bar{x} = 4.70, SD=0.49), and 3) the management of governance models through collaboration (\bar{x} =4.68, SD=0.78). 2) The results of the policy proposals and guidelines for developing gifted athletes towards excellence included 9 policy issues: 1) policy on defining the national vision and direction, 2) policy on investment and budget, and 3) policy on youth development. The policy framework includes: 1) Sports infrastructure (Grassroots); 2) Talent Identification and Development (TID) policy; 3) Sports science and technology policy; 4) Gifted Sport Pedagogy policy (Sport for Educational Excellence); 5) Collaborative Governance policy; 6) Competition and award system policy; and 7) Official sponsorship policy. Expert evaluation revealed that the developed policies and guidelines are highly consistent and appropriate (\bar{x} = 4.45, SD= 0.71)
Conclusion: In conclusion, the research findings indicate that the needs and perspectives of administrators in sports educational institutions reflect common patterns and structural issues at the systemic levels of education and sports. Systemic analysis and synthesis within the framework of policy factors leading to international sports success (SPLISS Plus 2) revealed nine key policy components that demonstrate the mechanisms and relationships between factors and gaps affecting the systematic development of gifted athletes towards international excellence.
References
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2561). รายงานผลการดำเนินงานด้านการพัฒนากีฬาเพื่อความเป็นเลิศของมหาวิทยาลัยการกีฬาแห่งชาติและโรงเรียนกีฬา. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน, กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
สำนักงานพัฒนาการกีฬาแห่งชาติ. (2565). รายงานการประเมินผลการดำเนินงานของมหาวิทยาลัยการกีฬาแห่งชาติและโรงเรียนกีฬา. สำนักงานพัฒนาการกีฬาแห่งชาติ, กระทรวงการท่องเที่ยวและกีฬา.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2566). ข้อเสนอเชิงนโยบายและแนวทางการพัฒนาผู้เรียนสู่ความเป็นเลิศในระดับนานาชาติ. บริษัทพริกหวานกราฟฟิค จำกัด.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร. (2565). การศึกษาเพื่อวิเคราะห์งบประมาณการพัฒนากีฬาเพื่อความเป็นเลิศ. สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร.
Baguero, B. (2014). Dual career of elite athletes: A systematic review of challenges, strategies and educational support system [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Porto.
Bowman, R., et al. (2020). Athletic intelligence quotient (AIQ): A cognitive framework for elite sport performance assessment. United States.
De Bosscher, V. (2015). Managing high performance sport. Routledge.
De Bosscher, V., Bingham, J., Shibli, S., Van Bottenburg, M., & De Knop, P. (2017). The global sporting arms race: An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Journal of Sport Management, 31(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2016-0180
De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2008). The global sporting arms race: An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Meyer & Meyer Sport.
De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., Westerbeek, H., & Van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Successful elite sport policies: An international comparison of the sports policy factors leading to international sporting success (SPLISS 2.0). Meyer & Meyer Sport.
European Commission. (2012). EU guidelines on dual careers of athletes: Recommended policy actions in support of dual careers in high-performance sport. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/52683
Johnsen, S. K., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Prufrock Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Maker, C. J. (2005). The DISCOVER curriculum model: Research and development. In F. A. Dixon & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 160–179). Prufrock Press.
Memmert, D., & Roca, A. (2017). Creativity in sport. Routledge.
Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2020). Education programs for talented students: The EPTS model. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20903582
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018). Curriculum planning and instruction for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.







.png)
