Development of Integrated Soft Power Learning Units in Basic Science for Career Course: A Case Study of Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e292085Keywords:
Soft Power, Basic Science for Career Course, Integrated Learning Units, San Pa Tong District, Learning Unit DevelopmentAbstract
Background and Aims: The National Economic and Social Development Plan outlines the direction for advancing the country toward sustainability through innovation, science, and technology. The subject Basic Science for Career Education plays a crucial role in promoting analytical thinking skills and the application of knowledge to real-life situations. The Thai government has promoted the development of Soft Power in five dimensions (5F) as a means to enhance the economy and the nation’s image. Integrating this concept into teaching and learning, therefore, serves as a key strategy in learner development. San Pa Tong District, Chiang Mai Province, is a culturally rich area with diverse wisdom and cultural capital that can be connected to all five dimensions of Soft Power (5F), making it a potential model area for developing learning units that integrate local wisdom with science. This independent study aims to: Design and develop learning units integrating Soft Power in the subject Basic Science for Career Education at Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology. Evaluate the quality of the developed learning units integrating Soft Power in the subject Basic Science for Career Education at Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology.
Methodology: The study entitled Development of Integrated Soft Power Learning Units in Basic Science for Career Course: A Case Study of Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology was conducted in two phases according to the research objectives. Phase 1 aimed to develop learning units that integrate Soft Power into the Basic Occupational Science subject at Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology. This phase was divided into two main steps: Step 1 involved studying the five dimensions of Soft Power (5F) in San Pa Tong District, Chiang Mai Province. Data were collected using structured interviews with 25 local experts and folk wisdom teachers—five individuals for each of the five dimensions based on their areas of expertise. Step 2 focused on constructing the integrated learning units. This was done through Focus Group Discussions involving seven participants: one school administrator, one curriculum and instruction expert, one science teacher, one educational supervisor, one teacher responsible for curriculum management, one teacher responsible for assessment and evaluation, and one community development officer from San Pa Tong District. Phase 2 aimed to evaluate the quality of the Soft Power-integrated learning units in the Basic Science for Career Course. The tool used for evaluation was a quality assessment form for the learning units, covering three main aspects: accuracy, appropriateness, and feasibility. The evaluation was conducted by five experts, divided into four groups: one school administrator, one science teacher, one educational supervisor, and two curriculum and instruction specialists. The statistical methods used for data analysis were mean, percentage, and standard deviation.
Results: The Soft Power-Integrated Learning Units in Basic Science for Career Course: A Case Study of Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology consist of five units, each aligned with one of the five dimensions of Soft Power. These units were carefully designed to integrate fundamental scientific knowledge with local Soft Power contexts. The five units are: Unit 1: Food – “The Famous Larb Kway of San Pa Tong” Unit 2: Film – “Kad Ngua the Local Marketplace” Unit 3: Fashion – “San Pa Tong Lacquerware Handicrafts” Unit 4: Fighting – “Sword Dance: Traditional Thai Martial Art of San Pa Tong” Unit 5: Festival – “Loi Khomot: The Traditional Mon Community Festival” Each learning unit comprises six components: Unit Title Core Content Unit Competency Learning Objectives Learning Activities Assessment and Evaluation The quality assessment of the five learning units was conducted based on three criteria: accuracy, appropriateness, and feasibility. Each unit was evaluated in all six components. The results of the expert evaluation showed that all five units were rated at the highest quality level in every aspect. The average scores were as follows: Appropriateness: 4.65 (S.D. = 0.03), Accuracy: 4.59 (S.D. = 0.03), Feasibility: 4.52 (S.D. = 0.07). These results indicate that the developed Soft Power-integrated learning units are complete and ready to be implemented in the teaching and learning of the Basic Occupational Science subject.
Conclusion: The Soft Power-Integrated Learning Units in Basic Science for Career Course at Chiang Mai College of Agriculture and Technology were developed by linking scientific knowledge with local cultural capital. These consist of five learning units, each representing one of the five dimensions of Soft Power: Unit 1: Food – “The Famous Larb Kway of San Pa Tong” Unit 2: Film – “Kad Ngua the Local Marketplace” Unit 3: Fashion – “San Pa Tong Lacquerware Handicrafts” Unit 4: Fighting – “Sword Dance: Traditional Thai Martial Art of San Pa Tong” Unit 5: Festival – “Loi Khomot: The Traditional Mon Community Festival” Each unit contains clearly defined components: unit title, core content, competencies, learning objectives, learning activities, and assessment methods. According to expert evaluations, the learning units were found to be comprehensive, appropriate, and effectively applicable in practice. They promote scientific skills alongside the sustainable preservation of local culture at the vocational education level.
References
นฤมล คำปัญญา. (2556). การพัฒนาหน่วยการเรียนรู้โดยใช้แหล่งเรียนรู้เชิงประวัติศาสตร์และวัฒนธรรมชุมชนเป็นฐาน สำหรับนักเรียนโรงเรียนเทศบาลวัดเกตการาม อำเภอเมืองเชียงใหม่ (วิทยานิพนธ์ศึกษาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต, มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่). บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่.
ไพรัช สุขเกษม. (2567). การพัฒนาหลักสูตรกิจกรรมชุมนุมตามแนวคิด Soft Power เพื่อเสริมสร้างทักษะการพูดภาษาอังกฤษเพื่อการท่องเที่ยวจังหวัดเชียงราย สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาตอนต้น. วารสารครุศาสตร์วิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏเชียงราย.
วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2563). การเรียนรู้แบบบูรณาการเชิงพื้นที่: การเรียนรู้ที่เชื่อมโยงชีวิต ชุมชน และวิชา. สถาบันส่งเสริมการเรียนรู้เพื่ออนาคต.
วิชัย วงษ์ใหญ่ & มารุต พัฒผล. (2560). การเรียนรู้ส่วนบุคคล Personalized Learning. กรุงเทพฯ: จรัลสนิทวงศ์การพิมพ์.
วิชัย วงษ์ใหญ่. (2537). กระบวนการพัฒนาหลักสูตรและการเรียนการสอนภาคปฏิบัติ. กรุงเทพฯ: สุวีริยาสาส์น.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอาชีวศึกษา. (2567). หลักสูตรระดับประกาศนียบัตรวิชาชีพ. กรุงเทพฯ.
สำนักงานพัฒนาชุมชนอำเภอสันป่าตอง. (2567). บริบทของอำเภอสันป่าตอง. เชียงใหม่.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร. (2565). รายงานการประชุมสภาผู้แทนราษฎร ประจำปี 2565: Soft Power (อำนาจละมุน). สำนักพิมพ์รัฐสภา.
สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2566). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13 (พ.ศ. 2566–2570). กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.
สุภาพิชญ์ ถิระวัฒน์. (2565). Soft Power อำนาจละมุน. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 พฤษภาคม 2565, จาก https://library.parliament.go.th/th/radioscript/rr2565-may7
Bettine, A., Picoli, M., & Bin, L. (2022). Gaining soft power by fostering science, technology and innovation. Journal of Innovation and Policy Studies, 10(2), 123–138.
Fullan, M. (2025). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press. https://michaelfullan.ca
Gauttam, A., Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2023). Education as a soft power resource: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 101–115.
Kalandides, A. (2011). The problem with spatial identity: Revisiting the “sense of place”. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 28–39.
Li, X., & Nye, R. (2004). Conceptualizing the soft power conversion model of higher education. [Publisher not specified].
Oliva, P. F., & Gordon II, W. R. (2013). Developing the curriculum (8th ed.). Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed., Global Edition). Pearson Education.
UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report 2019: Migration, displacement and education – Building bridges, not walls (Second ed.). UNESCO.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.






.png)
