Development of Learning Management Model to Promote Mathematical Thinking Processes for Students in Grade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e288508Keywords:
Learning Management Model, Mathematical Thinking ProcessesAbstract
Background and Aims: Mathematical thinking refers to the use of mathematical tools to understand various phenomena in the world around us. It enables individuals to apply mathematical skills beyond the classroom, recognize patterns, identify common situations in problems, detect errors, and develop new strategies. This leads to a systematic approach to solving quantitative problems, as a result of mathematical learning and practice, with an emphasis on understanding rather than focusing solely on results or answers. This research aims to: 1. Study the background information and the needs for developing a learning management model to promote mathematical thinking processes for Grade 5 students. 2. Develop and determine the effectiveness of a learning management model to promote mathematical thinking processes for Grade 5 students to meet the efficiency criteria of 80/80.
Methodology: The sample group used in this study consisted of 40 Grade 5 students who were studying in the second semester of the 2023 academic year at a school in Suphanburi Province. The sample was obtained using cluster random sampling. The research instruments included a learning management model to promote mathematical thinking processes, learning management plans, a mathematical thinking processes test, and a questionnaire on students’ opinions. Data analysis involved the use of mean (M), standard deviation (SD), Efficiency values (E1/E2), t-test for dependent samples, and content analysis.
Results: Research Findings: (1) The results of the analysis of basic information and essential needs revealed that the principles of learning management should aim to promote comprehensive and well-rounded mathematical thinking processes in learners. This leads to the development of competencies in accordance with the curriculum, with instruction tailored to the learners’ prior knowledge. The learning process should follow a clear and sequential structure and be applicable to daily life. Key components include problem-solving Reasoning communication connections representation of ideas. Instructional techniques and strategies involve group-based hands-on learning activities, using questioning techniques to stimulate thinking and encourage student expression. Students work collaboratively in groups, following a structured learning development process that emphasizes activities encouraging analytical thinking and group discussion. Teachers play a guiding role, providing direction while allowing students to collaboratively analyze problems and express reasoned opinions. Teachers also promote, support, and engage in discussion with students. Assessment and evaluation employ a variety of tools, utilizing diverse learning resources, media, and technologies that support learning in an accessible and age-appropriate manner. (2) The learning management model to promote mathematical thinking processes for Grade 5 students (GACPA Model) consists of 4 components: 1) Principles, 2) Objectives, 3) Learning management process, which includes 5 steps: 3.1) Creating interest, 3.2) Activating prior knowledge, 3.3) Collaborative work, 3.4) Presenting content, 3.5) Evaluation. And 4) Measurement and assessment have an effectiveness score of 82.35/82.23.
Conclusion: The research underlines the necessity of structuring learning experiences that foster holistic mathematical thinking customized to students’ past knowledge. A systematic, student-centered method for encouraging participation, teamwork, and critical thinking in mathematics is provided by the GACPA Model. The model's strong efficacy suggests that it has the ability to improve the mathematical proficiency of students in Grade 5.
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2560). หลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551 (ฉบับปรับปรุง พ.ศ. 2560). สำนักวิชาการและมาตรฐานการศึกษา.
กิตติมา ปัทมาวิไล. (2559). แนวทางการจัดการเรียนรู้คณิตศาสตร์เพื่อส่งเสริมการคิดทางคณิตศาสตร์. สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
ชิดชนก ตะโกพร. (2565). การส่งเสริมการคิดเชิงคำนวณในระดับประถมศึกษา. มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.
ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2545). ศิลปะการสอน. สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
วิภาดา ศรีจอมขวัญ. (2556). กลยุทธ์การเรียนรู้เพื่อพัฒนาการคิด. สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง.
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. Wiley.
Chapman, O. (2013). Supporting the development of mathematical thinking. The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 14–20.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (1989). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). Harper Collins.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.
Fraivillig, J. L. (2001). Strategies for advancing children's mathematical thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(8), 452–455.
Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and media: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Hartman, H. J. (2012). Teaching and learning in a concept-based curriculum: A how-to best practice approach. Springer.
Henderson, R. (2002). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. College Teaching, 50(1), 1–3.
Isoda, M., & Katagiri, S. (2012). Mathematical thinking: How to develop it in the classroom. World Scientific.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Pearson.
Kemp, J. E. (1985). Instructional design: A plan for unit and course development. Harper & Row.
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Wiley.
Kriegler, S. (2004). Math interventions: Building number power with formative assessments, differentiation, and games. Scholastic.
Kruse, J. W. (2008). Developing mathematical reasoning through inquiry. NCTM.
Lim, C. S., & Hwa, T. Y. (2007). The effects of metacognitive training on mathematical word problem solving. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1–16.
Maher, C. A. (2011). The role of teachers in the development of mathematical reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 271–290.
Mason, J., & Stacey, K. (1994). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. Heinemann.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.






.png)
