The Role of School Administrators in the Implementation of the Student Care and Support System of Schools Under the Office of Special Education Administration, Northeastern Region

Abstract

Background and Aims: The Thai education system today faces numerous challenges due to the rapid advancement of Thai society in various aspects, particularly in the areas of economy, culture, and technology, all of which have become increasingly influential in the lives of children and youth. The progress of science and technology has brought about significant changes in many areas. The student support system is an educational process within schools that focuses on promotion, prevention, and problem-solving, aiming to enhance the quality of life and development of every student. The objective of this research is to study and compare the level of opinions of personnel regarding the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region, classified by education level and position. Additionally, the research aims to explore ways to develop the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region.

Methodology: The sample group used in this research consisted of 330 personnel from schools under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Special Education Administration in the Northeastern region. The sample size was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s sampling table, followed by stratified random sampling. The research instruments included a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire with an Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.80 to 1.00, and a reliability coefficient of 0.81, as well as a structured interview. The statistical methods used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and F-test.

Results: The study findings revealed the following: 1. The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools is overall at a high level (= 4.38; S.D.= 0.42). 2. The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region, when classified by education level and position, showed significant statistical differences at the .05 level. And 3. The development guidelines for the role of school administrators in implementing the student support system in schools under the Special Education Administration Office of the Northeastern Region indicate that there should be systematic monitoring and data collection on students' health and behavior. A variety of screening methods should be used to classify students into normal, at-risk, or problematic groups. Special support should be provided for students with exceptional abilities, and appropriate activities should be promoted. Opportunities should be given for students to participate and take leadership roles in organizing activities. The use of technology in providing timely counseling and support for students should be encouraged, and information should be used to refer students with serious problems to experts, with continuous follow-up.

Conclusion: The role of school administrators in implementing the student support system is overall at a high level, with significant statistical differences based on education level and position. The development guidelines suggest systematically monitoring students' health and behavior data, utilizing technology and information systems for counseling, and referring students with serious problems to experts, with continuous follow-up.