Integrating Social-Emotional Intelligence in Alpha Generation Social Studies Learning
Keywords:
Social and Emotional Intelligence, Social Studies Learning Management, Alpha Generation Students, Teacher RolesAbstract
This article examines the significance of developing social and emotional intelligence within a pedagogical framework for social studies education targeting Generation Alpha learners through employing systematic analysis and synthesis of relevant research literature. The findings reveal that social and emotional intelligence, as conceptualized within the CASEL framework, constitutes a critical component for learner development in the 21st-century educational paradigm. Social studies education serves as an optimal curricular domain for integrating social and emotional intelligence due to the inherent nature of its content, which encompasses citizenship education and societal problem-solving competencies. The authors propose the “Emotion-Social-Context” pedagogical technique, comprising 6 sequential phases: 1) event presentation, 2) emotional analysis, 3) role-playing simulation, 4) social contextual analysis, 5) reflective connection to contemporary issues, and 6) comprehensive assessment. This methodological approach addresses the distinctive learning characteristics of Generation Alpha learners who have developed within digitally-mediated environments. Despite substantial empirical evidence supporting this pedagogical approach's efficacy, the Thai educational system continues to encounter significant implementation challenges. Therefore, systematic teacher professional development and comprehensive assessment system reform remain imperative to ensure the authentic actualization of social and emotional intelligence development initiatives.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bangkok Post. (2022). Long-overdue end of O-Net exams.https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2044427/long-overdue-end-of-o-net-exams
CASEL. (2020). CASEL's SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Cipriano, C., Brackett, M. A., Schlinger, M., Torrente, C., Rivers, S. E., Elbertson, N. A., ... & Yoder, N. (2023). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta‐analysis of universal school‐based SEL interventions. Child Development, 94(5), 1181-1204.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL's SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted. https://casel.org/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/
Department of Mental Health. (2021). Report on the Mental Health Situation of Thai Children and Youth 2021. Department of Mental Health. (In Thai)
Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice. Guilford Press.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Elias, M. J., & Arnold, H. (2015). Social-emotional learning and character development. In W. G. Scarlett (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of classroom management (pp. 759-763). SAGE Publications.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
Goleman, D. (2011). The brain and emotional intelligence: New insights. More Than Sound.
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Durlak, J. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children, 27(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0001
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x
Jones, S. M., Bailey, R., Brush, K., & Kahn, J. (2017). Kernels of practice for SEL: Low-cost, low-burden strategies. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
McCrindle, M., & Wolfinger, E. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd. NCBI. (2017). Quality of Life, Mental Health and Educational Stress of High School Students in the Northeast of Thailand. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620889/
Okwuduba, E. N., Nwosu, K. C., Okigbo, E. C., Samuel, N. N., & Achugbu, C. (2021). Impact of intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional intelligence and academic self-efficacy on academic performance among pre-university science students. Heliyon, 7(3), e06611.
Pholphirul, P., Rukumnuaykit, P., & Teimtad, S. (2023). Teacher shortages and educational outcomes in developing countries: Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243126
Positive Action. (2024). 20 Evidence-based social skills activities and games for kids. Retrieved from https://www.positiveaction.net/blog/social-skills-activities-and-games-for-kids
Rosiek, J. (2003). Emotional Scaffolding: An Exploration of the Teacher Knowledge at the Intersection of Student Emotion and the Subject Matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103257089
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137-155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44219025
Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(3), 45-54. https://isedj.org/2018-16/n3/ISEDJv16n3p45.html
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus, 22(3), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Sheppard, M., & Kollasch, C. M. (2025). A framework for critical emotional engagement in historyeducation. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2025.2462663
Tan, C. (2020). Comparing high-performing education systems: Understanding Singapore, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. Routledge.
Tan, C., & Tan, L. S. (2014). The role of optimism, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy and gender in high-ability students. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0134-5
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
UNICEF Thailand. (2024). The costs and benefits of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) for children and adolescents in education settings in Thailand. UNICEF Thailand Country Office.
Viriyapong, R., & Harfield, A. (2013). Facing the challenges of the One-Tablet-Per-Child policy in Thai primary school education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(9), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040928
Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.). (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3–19). The Guilford Press.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Loei Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏเลย ถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรง กองบรรณาธิการวารสารไม่มีส่วนในความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบใดที่เกี่ยวข้องกับบทความดังกล่าว ทั้งนี้ บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสาร ฯ ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร

