Mathematics Teachers as Designers of Learning: Exploring Design Thinking Experiences in Instructional Innovation
Keywords:
Design thinking, Mathematics education, Pedagogical innovation, Reflective practiceAbstract
This qualitative case study examined how in-service mathematics teachers redesigned their classroom practices through design thinking as an approach to instructional innovation. Drawing on human-centered design, the study explored how teachers responded to students’ learning needs, classroom contexts, and changing educational demands by developing new teaching practices. Specifically, it investigated teachers’ experiences of redesigning mathematics instruction, the challenges they encountered, and the reflective practices that supported continuous improvement. Data consisted of teachers’ reflective narratives and accounts of their innovation experiences, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings showed that teachers based their instructional decisions on students’ learning difficulties, including misconceptions, low engagement, language barriers, and challenges in understanding abstract mathematical concepts. They redesigned lessons by using contextualized and culturally relevant approaches, such as local materials, community-based activities, manipulatives, games, translanguaging, and hands-on learning experiences. These strategies helped make mathematics more meaningful, engaging, and accessible for students. The study also found that successful instructional innovation depended on continuous scaffolding, collaboration, active student participation, and the use of multiple learning approaches to strengthen conceptual understanding and reduce mathematics anxiety. At the same time, teachers faced challenges related to limited resources, time constraints, diverse student needs, and the additional preparation required to implement innovative lessons. Despite these challenges, they continued to improve their teaching through reflection, ongoing revision, and adaptation to their classroom contexts. The findings suggest that redesigning mathematics instruction through design thinking is an ongoing process in which teachers understand students’ needs, develop and refine new instructional ideas, and adapt their practices based on classroom experiences. The study highlights the important role of teachers as reflective instructional designers and suggests that sustained innovation in mathematics education requires supportive school environments, professional collaboration, and opportunities for continuous learning and improvement.
References
Amir, M., & Ansari, A. (2026). Challenges related to mathematics education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.69466
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harvard Business Press.
Chand, S. P. (2023). Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(7), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800
Deng, Y., Lucas, C., & Liu, W. (2026). A systematic review of design thinking implementations in higher engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2026.2640060
Diago, P. N., & Dillo, L. R. (2022). The practices of Filipino teachers in contextualizing mathematics. International Journal of Science and Research, 11(7), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20204104
Escalaw, M. (2024). Revolutionizing math education: The impact of multimodal teaching approaches. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development, 9(7), 21–26.
Fabrigas, J. P., & Taban, J. G. (2023). Contextualization and localization of teaching mathematics in the new normal. The Asian Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(1), 153–166.
Fernandez, R. S., & Aclao, J. T. (2025). Trends and innovations in mathematics education: A bibliometric review of pedagogical methods, technological integration and global perspectives. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 50(7), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.500705
Filiz, T., & Öztel, N. Ç. (2026). Strategy instruction integrated with realistic mathematics education: A design-based research on teaching word problem solving to students with learning disabilities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 61, Article 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102203
Gagaza, M., & Sarmiento, C. (2022). Investigating mathematics teachers’ perceived design thinking mindset and related factors. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E- Learning (IC4E ’22) (pp. 59–64). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514291
Gaylo, D. (2025). Learning by design: An exploration of mathematics teachers' practice-based transformation. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 21(2), 180–191.
Gaylo, D. N., & Dales, Z. I. (2017). Metacognitive strategies: Their effects on students’ academic achievement and engagement in mathematics. World Review of Business Research, 7(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3951851
Horn, I., Aggül, Y., Li, S., & Hood, C. (2025). Teachers’ subjectivities in responsive instruction: When ambitious practice encounters challenging teaching situations. Instructional Science, 53, 1889–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09742-7
Jimenez-Silva, M., Martin, R., Restani, R., Abdelrahim, S., & Albano, T. (2025). Supporting multilingual students’ mathematical discourse through teacher professional development grounded in design-based research: A conceptual framework. Education Sciences, 15(6), 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060778
Kannan, K., Patil, K., Dharmavaram, A., Shukla, P., & Kumar, S. (2025). Design thinking for innovative solutions for math education. In 2025 International Conference on Computing for Sustainability and Intelligent Future (COMP-SIF) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMP-SIF65618.2025.10969899
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Legarde, M. A. (2026). Reimagining mathematics education through context and culture: Emerging opportunities and pedagogical challenges. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 46, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i46.2307
Nur, A. S., Kartono, Zaenuri, & Rochmad. (2022). Teacher’s perception of culture-based mathematics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2633(1), 030007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102825
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). An evolution of mathematics curriculum: Where it was, where it stands and where it is going. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ffd89d0-en
Samuels, A. J. (2018). Exploring culturally responsive pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives on fostering equitable and inclusive classrooms. SRATE Journal, 27(1), 22–30.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Simms, V., Gilmore, C., Sloan, S., & McKeaveney, C. (2018). Protocol for a systematic review: Interventions to improve mathematics achievement in primary school-aged children: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.215
Sugawara, M., Sekao, D., & Sibiya, M. R. (2026). Investigating learners’ misconceptions on division of whole numbers to identify a goal of research lesson: A case of lesson study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(1), Article em0863. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/17700
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




