The Development of Scientific Concept Using Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain learning method cooperated with Augmented Reality
Keywords:
Scientific Concept, Augmented Reality, Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain learning methodAbstract
This action research aim 1) to develop the scientific concept by using model-observe-reflect-explain learning method cooperated with augmented reality of student passing the criteria of partial understanding 2) to study the students’ scientific concepts after using model-observe-reflect-explain learning method cooperated with augmented reality. The target contained of 19 students of Mattayomsuksa 4 who were considered as limited in scientific concept of Kalasin Pittayasan School. The purposive sampling was used to select the target group. The action research consisted of 3 cycles. The instruments employed in study were (1) lesson plan, (2) the scientific conceptual test, (3) interview form, and (4) observation form. The study findings indicated that there were 15 students or 93.75 percent in passing the criteria of partial understanding. When considering each cycle, it was found as follows:
The first cycle, there were 9 students (52.25 percent) in passing the criteria of target group, and the majority of the students had a partial understanding (PU).
The second cycle, there were 14 students (87.50 percent) in passing the criteria of target group, and the majority of the students had a sound understanding (SU).
The third cycle, there were 15 students (93.75 percent) in passing the criteria of target group, and the majority of the students had a partial understanding (PU).
References
Boonrod, J. (2014). EFFECT OF SCIENCE INSTRUCTION USING MODEL ON SCIENCE LEARNINGACHIEVEMENT AND SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION ABILITY OFLOER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. Master’s thesis: Chulalongkorn University.
Caeillo, C., Lee, C., & Reicky, D. (2005). Enhancing science teaching by doing : A framework to guide chemistry student's thinking in the laboratory. National Science Teachers Association, 72(7), 60-64.
Elliott, S., Kratochwill, T., Littlefield Cook, J., & Travers, J. (2000). Effective teaching, effective learning (3rded). Boston: McGraw-Hill College.
Gilbert, J. (2005). Visualization in science education. Netherlands: springer.
Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Elmer, R. (2000). Developing Models in Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Printed in the Netherlands.
Haidar. (1997). Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptions of the Conservation of Matter and Related Concepts. journal of research in science teaching, 171-197.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). Starter projects for sixth year studies. Glasgow: Centre for Science Education.
Kantho, T. (2020). Applying three levels of thinking with animation to develop secondary school students' scientific conceptual understanding of the separation of substance Master’s thesis: Chiang Mai University.
Ketsing, J. (2019). Science classroom action research: A learning pathway for improving you. Master’s thesis: Kasetsart University.
Khemthong, P., Khaomek, P., & Sukprasertchai, T. (2017). The Development of Matthayomsuksa 4th ’s Scientific Concepts on Covalent Bond Using Model Observe-Reflect-Explain (MORE) with Augmented Reality Technologies (AR). Nation Academic conference. Khon Kaen: University.
Mattox, A., Reisner, B., & Rickey, D. (2006). What happens when chemical compounds are added to water? An introduction to the Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain (MORE) Thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(4), 622-624.
Meesuwan, W. (2011). Learning by creating a virtual world combining the real world. Journal of Naresuan University. 13(2), 119-127.
Moutinho, s., Moura, R., & Vasconcelos, C. (2017). Contributions if model-based learning to the restructuring of graduation students' mental on natural hazards. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3043-3068.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum 2008. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperatives Association of Thailand Printing Company Limited.
Office of the National Education Commission Office of the Prime Minister. (2002). National Education Act 1999 and amendments (No. 2) 2002. Bangkok: Phrik Wan Graphic Company Limited.
Promrit. S. (2019). Understanding scientific concepts. Titration matters For Mathayom 5 students, learning is organized by modeling observation-reflection-explanation. together with explaining three levels of chemical phenomena. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 83-96.
Tien, T., Ricky, D., & Stacy, M. (2017). The MORE Thinking Frame: Guiding Students' Thinking in the Laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 318-324.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal for Developing the Social and Community
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles that are published are copyrighted by the authors of the articles
