ALGORITHMIC AFFECTIVE REGIMES AND PUBLIC OPINION GOVERNANCE ON DOUYIN: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SHORT-VIDEO PLATFORM ECOLOGY

ผู้แต่ง

  • Meng Yuan Ph.D. student in Communication Arts, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Narong Anurak College of Communication Arts, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

คำสำคัญ:

Algorithmic Affective Regime, Affective Publics, Visibility Politics, Short-video Platforms, Public Opinion Governance, Multi-stakeholder Platform Governance

บทคัดย่อ

Platformization has reshaped the logic of public communication, making short-video platforms core infrastructure for the formation of public opinion. Using Douyin as a Chinese empirical case, this study constructs a unified analytical framework of Algorithmic Affective Regimes and adopts constructivist qualitative triangulation: 10 semi-structured expert interviews, three focus groups with 24 platform users, and thematic analysis of 140 policy, platform, and academic documents.  

The core findings are as follows. First, based on insiders’ accounts and platform regulatory documents, Douyin’s recommendation metrics (watch duration, interaction rate, completion rate) structurally reward high-arousal emotional content, producing fluid, rapidly circulating public opinion with short issue life cycles. Second, algorithmic visibility stratification compels users to perform affective labor to gain exposure, turning emotional expression into the primary mode of public participation and creating affective echo chambers. Third, unequal visibility allocation extends spiral of silence theory into an algorithmic iteration, in which marginal viewpoints face systematic suppression in circulation. Fourth, platform governance suffers from a persistent lag, caught in structural tensions among commercial algorithmic logic, state institutional regulatory duties, and users’ cultural communication demands. To mitigate these contradictions, this study develops a four-dimensional collaborative governance model grounded in empirical findings: technologically value-sensitive algorithm design, cross-stakeholder institutional coordination, public algorithmic-affective media literacy, and rational affective cultural cultivation. This paper systematically defines the multidimensional structure of Algorithmic Affective Regimes, distinguishes this framework from related communication theories, and offers targeted, context-specific governance suggestions for Chinese short-video platforms. This study enriches non-Western platform governance research and provides a transferable Algorithmic Affective Regime framework for comparative media studies in Southeast Asia.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313-7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114

Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159

Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.

Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

China Internet Network Information Center. (2025). The 55th statistical report on China’s internet development. https://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202505/P020250514564119130448.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684

Duffy, B. E., & Meisner, C. (2023). Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). MIT Press.

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 203–218. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/ctlj/vol13/iss2/4

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2026-08-03

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Yuan, M., & Anurak, N. . (2026). ALGORITHMIC AFFECTIVE REGIMES AND PUBLIC OPINION GOVERNANCE ON DOUYIN: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SHORT-VIDEO PLATFORM ECOLOGY. วารสารวิชาการสังคมศาสตร์เครือข่ายวิจัยประชาชื่น, 8(2), 27–45. สืบค้น จาก https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/prn/article/view/298166

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิจัย