ORGANIZATIONAL CHALLENGES AND CAPABILITIES IN ENHANCING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY: A CASE STUDY OF THAILAND'S CONTRACT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

ผู้แต่ง

  • Thamonwan Waengwan Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Boontharika Wongvanich Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi

คำสำคัญ:

Organizational Challenges, Production Efficiency, Contract Manufacturing Industry

บทคัดย่อ

This article examines organizational challenges and capabilities in enhancing production efficiency within Thailand’s contract manufacturing industry, using a case study research design focused on contract manufacturers in the electronics and automotive sectors. It also analyzes the role of government policies, particularly the Thailand 4.0 policy framework and the EEC initiative. The findings reveal that Thailand’s contract manufacturing industry faces several critical challenges, including risks from heavy dependence on major customers and an imbalanced customer portfolio, the complexity of managing diverse and stringent quality standards, limited production line flexibility, difficulties integrating advanced technologies to meet the heterogeneous requirements of multiple clients, and constraints related to workforce skills and adaptive capabilities. The study further indicates that developing organizational capabilities across multiple dimensions – such as strategic customer portfolio management, flexible manufacturing processes, adaptive quality management systems, transformational leadership, and an organizational culture that promotes continuous learning and innovation – can significantly enhance production efficiency and competitiveness. Evidence from the case study of Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited shows that sustained investment in digital infrastructure, continuous workforce upskilling, and collaborative innovation with customers play a crucial role in strengthening organizational resilience and achieving long-term competitive sustainability.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Impact of dynamic capabilities on digital transformation and innovation to improve banking performance: A TOE framework study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100215

Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825919

Chanyoothayotin, O., & Lertwisuttipaiboon, S. (2022). Development of standard system integration process for the automotive industry. The Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 175–192.

Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275

Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.183

Donate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.022

Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=40142

ElMaraghy, H., Algeddawy, T., Azab, A., & ElMaraghy, W. (2011, October 2). Change in manufacturing–research and industrial challenges. In Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual production, (pp. 2-9). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004

Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization?. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116. https://hbr.org/2008/03/is-yours-a-learning-organization

Gereffi, G. (2019). Global value chains and international development policy: Bringing firms, networks and policy-engaged scholarship back in. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-019-00028-7

Hecklau, F., Galeitzke, M., Flachs, S., & Kohl, H. (2016). Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102

Intalar, N., Ueki, Y., & Jeenanunta, C. (2024). Enhancing Competitiveness: Driving and Facilitating Factors for Industry 4.0 Adoption in Thai Manufacturing. Economies, 12(8), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080210

Intarakumnerd, P., & Jutarosaga, T. (2023). The evolution of university–industry linkages in Thailand. Asian Economic Policy Review, 18(2), 265-282. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12422

Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086

Jangruxsakul, S., & Athikulrat, K. (2023). Evaluation of labor skill development projects in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) by using CIPP model. Maejo Business Review, 5(1), 1–20.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15760

Laskurain-Iturbe, I., Arana-Landín, G., Landeta-Manzano, B., & Uriarte-Gallastegi, N. (2021). Exploring the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128944

Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

Li, L. (2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(5), 1697-1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

National Economic and Social Development Council. (2024). Thai economic performance in Q2/2024 and outlook for 2024. https://www.nesdc.go.th/nesdb_en/article_attach/07%20Economic%20Report%202024-Q2.pdf

Ning, Y., Li, L., Xu, S. X., & Yang, S. (2023). How do digital technologies improve supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0230-4

Office of Industrial Economics. (2025). Manufacturing production index (MPI): January 2025. https://www.oie.go.th/oie2/uploads/news/4801-p1558j21793.pdf

Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Effects of ‘green’training on pro-environmental behaviors and job satisfaction: Evidence from the Italian healthcare sector. Journal of cleaner production, 226, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.048

Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2017). Total quality management elements and results in higher education institutions: The Greek case. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(2), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2015-0033

Reuters. (2025). Thailand factory output falls more than expected in June 2025. https://www.reuters.com

Simons, T., Leroy, H., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 831-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2332-3

Sturgeon, T. J. (2008). From commodity chains to value chains: interdisciplinary theory building in an age of globalization. https://isapapers.pitt.edu/84/1/2008%2D02_Sturgeon.pdf

Suwanwak, L., Suksawang, P., & Makmee, P. (2022). Development of the ICT competency assessment framework for preparing the labor on new S-Curve Industries in eastern special development zone. Dhonburi Rajabhat University Journal, 16(2), 11-26.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Thailand Automotive Institute. (2024). Facts & figures 2024. https://data.thaiauto.or.th/images/PDF/Facts_Figures_2024V1.pdf

Thanakijcharoenpat, S., Jarutirasarn, P., & Boonchunone, S. (2022). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and digital transformation components of performance in the automobile manufacturers industry in Thailand. Arts of Management Journal, 6(3), 1392–1405.

Tian, Y., & Cui, L. (2025). Supply chain resilience and digital transformation: perspectives from a supply chain network. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1738. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06011-3

UNCTAD. (2005). World Investment Report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://unctad.org/webflyer/world-investment-report-2005

Warnhorm, S., & Akakulanan, S. (2022). The participation in maintaining the quality management system standard ISO 9001 of employees in an information and communication technology company. BU Academic Review, 21(2), 1–14.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2025-12-25

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Waengwan, T., & Wongvanich, B. . (2025). ORGANIZATIONAL CHALLENGES AND CAPABILITIES IN ENHANCING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY: A CASE STUDY OF THAILAND’S CONTRACT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. วารสารวิชาการสังคมศาสตร์เครือข่ายวิจัยประชาชื่น, 7(3), 83–96. สืบค้น จาก https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/prn/article/view/290501

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิชาการ