Development of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Model for Secondary School Teachers in Shenzhen
คำสำคัญ:
Artificial intelligence literacy, Secondary school teachers, Information technology teaching methodsบทคัดย่อ
The purposes of this research were: 1) To study the current level of knowledge of secondary school teachers’ artificial intelligence literacy 2) To develop a teachers’ artificial intelligence literacy improvement model for secondary schools 3) To evaluate the teacher’s artificial intelligence literacy improvement model.
The study invited 21 experts to conduct three rounds of consulting using the Delphi method to identify core competencies and refine the model components. This was done to determine the variable issues of effective teacher artificial intelligence literacy, resulting in the developing of a model for improving secondary school teachers' primary index factors includes: Cognition, Ethics, Artificial Intelligence Applications, Artificial Intelligence Pedagogy, Development, and Evaluation. For the accuracy of the data, the interviewees were experts with professorial titles from artificial intelligence professionals, the online education field, and normal universities. The expert qualifies to have the rank of professor or above and has at least 20 years of experience working in a related field.
The results show that the Teacher Artificial Intelligence Literacy Model consists of 6 primary index factors and 36 secondary index factors. The specific content of the 6: Cognition, Ethics, Artificial Intelligence Applications, Artificial Intelligence Pedagogy, Development, and Evaluation.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P. Kehinde D. Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Chiu, T. K. F., et al. (2024). Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self reported to objective measures. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 7,100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100282
European Parliament. (2006). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Author.
Kong, S.-C., & Abelson, H. (Eds.). (2022). Computational Thinking Education in K–12: Artificial.
The MIT Press.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education. 193(3), 13–19.
Kim, S., Jang, Y., Choi, S., Kim, W., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Analyzing teacher competency with TPACK for K-12 AI education. KI–Künstliche Intelligenz. 35(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00721-2
Lin, P., & Van Brummelen, J. (2021). Engaging teachers to co-design integrated AI curriculum for K–12 classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445737
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Lin, B., & Zhang, B. (2024). Construction of civil servants' digital literacy based on the competency model in the artificial intelligence era. Information Technology and Management Application. (04), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.20186/j.cnki.hustitama2022.2024.04.14
McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence. 171(18), 1174–1182.
Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). Fostering responsible AI literacy: A systematic review of K-12 AI ethics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100422
Ministry of Education, China. (2023). Digital Education 2.0 Action Plan. Appendices. Author.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first-century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development. 71, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10249-0
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., et al. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 33(01), 9795-9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Breazeal, C., Martin, F. & Seehorn, D. (2019), A Year in K 12 AI education. AI Magazine. 40, 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i4.5289
UNESCO. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Teachers. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers
UNESCO. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Author.
Yang, Z., Yin, Y., Yang, G., Xu, J., Zeng, Q., & Chen, J. (2022). Construction of the artificial intelligence literacy model and its implementation path. Modern Educational Technology. (03), 42–50.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhao, F., Dai, Y., & Xu, J. (2023). Construction of evaluation indexes for middle school students' artificial intelligence literacy. Journal of Bingtuan Education Institute. (06), 68–74.
Zhang, H., & Guo, W. (2022). Research on the artificial intelligence literacy framework in the STEM context. E-Education Research. (04), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2022.04.004
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อความ ภาพประกอบ และตารางประกอบที่ลงพิมพ์ในวารสารเป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้นิพนธ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นตามเสมอไป และไม่มีส่วนรับผิดชอบใดๆ ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์เพียงผู้เดียว