รูปแบบภาวะผู้นำทางวิชาการของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษาระดับประถมศึกษาที่ส่งผลต่อประสิทธิผลการจัดการสถานศึกษาในโรงเรียนมาตรฐานสากล สังกัดสำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน

Ninwan  Tongtianchai; Mitparnee  Phongphua; Patee  Kesthanakorn

Authors

Ninwan Tongtianchai คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏกาญจนบุรี
Mitparnee Phongphua คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏกาญจนบุรี
Patee Kesthanakorn คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏกาญจนบุรี

Keywords:

Academic Leadership; The world class standard school

Abstract

The objectives of the research were to build and verify the validity of theacademic leadership model of primary school administrators that would affect the
school management effectiveness in the world class standard schools under theOffice of Basic Education Commission, The population was 406 school administratorsand deputy administrators on academic affairs in schools under the Office of BasicEducation Commission and the 324 samples were selected by multi-stage randomsampling. A constructed questionnaire for administrators to analyze was usingconfirmatory analysis employing LISRELThe main findings revealed that the academic leadership model includedone exogenous latent variable, that is, academic leadership, which consisted of three
observable factors, such as behavior of being academic leaders, participation inadministration, and competency of school administrators. Moreover, there was oneendogenous latent variable, that is school management effectiveness which consistedof five observable factors such as being a good person, being an intellectual person,eing a happy person, task accomplishment; advance in their career path. The results of verification of this model revealed that it was in accordance with the empirical data.(χ 2= 100.53 , df = 67 ; p = 0.005 ; GFI = 0.956 ; AGFI = 0.937 and RMSR = 0.040) The variable of academic leadership affected the effectiveness of school administration at 0.07

References

Byrne, B.M. (2006) .Structual Equation Modeling with EQS:Basic concept, Application,
and Programming (2nd). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaun.
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N T. (1977). Rural development participation: Concepts And
Measures For Project Design: Implementation and Evaluation. USA : Cornell
University.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R .L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate Data
Analysis (6thed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Pearson Education.
Hallinger,P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of
principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 221-224.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational Administration : Theory, Research,
And Practice (4th ed.). Singapore : McGraw-Hill.
Krejcie, R. A., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.
Education and Psychological Measurement, 607-609.
Napadech Booncherdchoo. (2552). The Development of A Model of School
Administrators competency Development in Accondance with Education
Professional Standards. (Doctoral Dissertation). Bangkok. Chulalongkorn
University
Prapan Boonwan. (2556). Problem State of International Standard School
Administration of Secondary School Clusters Attached to secondary
Educational Service Area office 34, Mae Hong on province. Journal of
Graduate School, Far Eastern University.
Purkey, S.C.& Smith M.S. (1983). Effective school : A review. The Elementary School
Journal, 83 (4).
Sasiporn Rintha. (2554). Sasiporn Rintha. (2554). Educational Mangement of The
School in World Class Standard School Project : a case Study of
Muangkhong School Under The Secondary Office Educational Service
Area 31. Doctoral Dissertation. Khon Khan. Khon Kan University.
Wantana Naowan. (2558). Leadership Development According to Buddhadhamma of
the Personnels of Phrapiriyaltitham Schools, General Education Section,
Group 3 , Journal of Mou Social Science Review, 4(2), 87-101