LEADERSHIP IN THE GOVERNMENT SECTOR: QUALITIES AND DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES
Keywords:
Leadership, Government Sector, Qualities, Development ApproachesAbstract
This academic article examined Leadership in the Government Sector: Qualities and Development Approaches. Leadership is the process by which individuals exert influence to guide groups to achieve goals, emphasizing both personal characteristics and social interactions. Leaders differ from managers in that they focus on inspiring and transforming rather than controlling them in the public sector. Leaders must be ethical, transparent, and build public trust, especially during crises. Furthermore, leaders are individuals, while leadership is the process of exercising influence and interaction to achieve organizational goals. Many scholars define leadership as the ability to influence, coordinate, and unite a group. Therefore, leadership is not limited to official positions, but also includes informal leaders who influence others. Public sector leaders must possess vision, integrity, transparency, and good communication skills. They must also manage change, embrace participation from all sectors, and be innovative. Leaders who combine these qualities can drive effective and sustainable development. For leadership development in the public sector, leaders should be developed through education, organizational culture building, and mentoring, promoting the use of digital technology and public participation in management, and implement continuous evaluation systems to improve and enhance leadership effectiveness sustainably. Obstacles and Challenges: Key obstacles to Thai public sector leaders include corruption, policy inconsistency, and resistance to change. Financial constraints and insufficiently transparent evaluation systems remain. These factors reduce administrative efficiency and undermine public confidence. Therefore, a transparent leadership selection system should be established, lifelong learning encouraged, and the civil service restructure modernized. This should foster collaboration between the public, private, and public sectors to drive policy with participation. The goal is a transparent, efficient, and truly socially responsive public administration system.
References
ธนาคารกรุงเทพ. (2564). 7 เหตุผลที่ทำให้ผู้นำล้มเหลวแบบฉับพลัน. สืบค้น 2 กันยายน 2568, จาก https://www.bangkokbanksme.com/en/reasons-for-failure
ประสาน หอมพูล และทิพวรรณ หอมพูล. (2540). จิตวิทยาทั่วไป. กรุงเทพฯ: วงอักษร.
ศิริโสภาคย์ บูรพาเดชะ. (2535). จิตวิทยาทั่วไป. กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สมยศ นาวีการ. (2538). การบริหาร Management (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4). กรุงเทพฯ: ดอกหญ้า.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการข้าราชการพลเรือน. (2562). รายงานการพัฒนาภาวะผู้นำของข้าราชการพลเรือน. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานคณะกรรมการข้าราชการพลเรือน.
อรุณัฐ ปุณยกนก. (2567). รายงานดัชนีการรับรู้การทุจริต พ.ศ. 2567 กับการแก้ไขปัญหาคอร์รัปชันของไทย. วารสารวิชาการรัฐศาสตร์และรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์, 7(2), 63–76.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–32.
Ciancarini, P. et al. (2023). Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: a Guided Tour For Computer Scientists. IEEE Access, 11, 1–25.
Gibson, J. L. et al. (1997). Organizations: Behavior structure processes (9th ed.). Boston, Mass: Irwin/ McGraw-Hill.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Júnior, J. A. de L., et al. (2024). The Use of The Open Innovation Paradigm in The Public Sector: A Systematic Review of Published Studies. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/JUj0M
McKinsey & Company. (2025). Character is Key: Leadership Excellence in The Public Sector. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/29cts
Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Quarles, N. L. (2001). Visionary Leadership: The Importance in the Public Sector from the Perspective of City Managers. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
Ratthanakwan, S. (2023). Transforming the Role of the State: Limitations and Challenges under the New Public Governance Concept. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation, 9(8), 1685–1703.
Sahl, D. F. et al. (2025). Bureaucratic Complexity in Thailand: Transformation, Socio-Culture, Law, and Politics. Jurnal Transformative, 11(1), 44–71.
Sazzad, F. et al. (2021). The Role of Leadership in Public Sector Innovation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Management of COVID 19 in Asian Countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 1–16.
Thai Examiner. (2025). Red Tape and Bureaucracy are Killing the Thai Economy. Retrieved September 1, 2025, from https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2025/10/07/red-tape-and-bureaucracy
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Boston: Pearson Higher Ed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of MCU Social Science Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of MCU Journal of Social Sciences. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.

