THE RELATIONSHIP MODEL AMONG TRANSFORMATION LEADERSHIP, INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIORS AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF PERSONEL ELECTRICITY GENERATING AUTHORITY OF THAILAND

Authors

  • Xiong Wei Christian University of Thailand
  • Chisanupong Thongpuang Christian University of Thailand
  • Pabhagorn Suvarnadhada Christian University of Thailand

Keywords:

Transformational Leadership, Innovative Work Behaviors, Job Performance

Abstract

Objectives of this research article were: 1. To study the level of opinions of transformational leadership. 2. To study a model of the relationship between transformational leadership. 3. To study the path of influence of transformational leadership, innovation creation behavior in work and the performance of employees of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand personnel It was quantitative research. The sample group consisted of 316 executives of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand and was obtained using stratified random sampling. The instrument used in this research was the transformational leadership questionnaire. Innovative behavior in work and performance results The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.95. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and path analysis statistics.

The results of the study were found that the transformational leadership had direct effect on the innovative work behaviors (β= 0.64, p<0.05), the transformational leadership had direct effect on the job performance personnel (β= 0.05, p< 0.05), the innovative work behaviors had direct effect on the job performance personnel (β= 0.84, p< 0.05). and the transformational leadership had an indirect effect on the job performance personnel through the innovative work behaviors (β= 0.54, p< 0.05). The transformational leadership, innovative work behaviors, and job performance of personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand were congruent with the empirical data (CMIN/DF = 1.43 GFI = 0.97 AGFI = 0.95 RMSEA = 0.04 RMR = 0.01 CFI =.0.99).

References

การไฟฟ้าฝ่ายผลิตแห่งประเทศไทย (กฟผ.). (2562). โครงสร้างองค์กร. สืบค้น 20 มกราคม 2564, จาก http:www.intranet.egat.co.th

_____. (2566). คู่มือค่านิยมการไฟฟ้าฝ่ายผลิตแห่งประเทศไทย. สืบค้น 5 มกราคม 2564, จาก https://issuu.com/egat.pr/docs/firm-c-manual-for-employee

ธานินทร์ ศิลป์จารุ. (2555). การวิจัยและวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลทางสถิติด้วย SPSS (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 7). กรุงเทพฯ: บิสซิเนสอาร์แอนด์ดี.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการนโยบายรัฐวิสาหกิจ (สคร.). (2562). รายงานการเงิน พ.ศ. 2562. สืบค้น 20 มกราคม 2564, จาก https://shorturl.asia/7HRGf

อารีย์วรรณ อ่วมตานี. (2554). การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพทางการพยาบาล. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.

Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing Transformational Leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(1), 21-27.

____. (1991). Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, C.A.: Consulting Psychological Press.

_____. (1994). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Public Administration, 17(1) 112-121.

Emmerik, I. J. (2008). It Is Not Only Mentoring: The Combined Influences of Individual-level and Team-level Support on Job Performance. Career Development International, 13(7), 575-593.

Jong, D. J. P. & Hartog, D. D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://shorturl.asia/Bvl4Z

_____. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviors. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

Koopmans, L. et al. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance a Systematic Review. Journal of Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 586-866.

_____. (2014). Construct Validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 153-171.

Marquis, B. L. & Huston, C. J. (2017). Leadership role and management function in nursing: theory and application (9th ed.). PA: Lippincott, William, & Wilkins.

McCarthy, A. M. & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360° Feedback Process: Performance, Improvement and Employee Career Development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(1), 5-32.

Momeni, M. et al. (2014). The Effect of Employees Self-Efficacy on Innovative Work Behavior at Social Security Organization Employees in Ardabil Province. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 33(2536), 1-4.

Nabil, H. et al. (2017). The Impact of Leadership on Creativity and Innovation. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(6), 55-62.

Scotter, V. J. R. & Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 525–531.

Sonnentag, S. & Frese, M. (2002). Psychological Management of Individual Performance. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Stoffers, J. et al. (2019). Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability. Sustainability,12(1), 1-25.

Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. (2014). Management innovation (5th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Wei, X., Thongpuang, C., & Suvarnadhada, P. (2024). THE RELATIONSHIP MODEL AMONG TRANSFORMATION LEADERSHIP, INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIORS AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF PERSONEL ELECTRICITY GENERATING AUTHORITY OF THAILAND. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 13(5), 290–302. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/269634