PROPOSALS EXPANSION FOR THE REFORM OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHERS, CHILD CARE PROVIDERS, AND ASSISTANT TEACHERS’ PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS: CHIANG MAI EDUCATION SANDBOX

Authors

  • Kiatsuda Srisuk Chiang Mai University

Keywords:

core competencies, reform of the early childhood teachers, education sandbox

Abstract

Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University is the one of three universities that was selected by the Equitable Education Fund as a university to expand proposals for reforming the production and development system in early childhood teachers in case studies of Chiang Mai Education Sandbox. There are 5 phases for the research process by analyzing quantitative data using basic descriptive statistics and analyzing qualitative data by content analysis.

The findings showed as follows: 1. Most of the target groups of teachers and childcare providers have less than five years of teaching experience, and more than half have a teaching license. 2. Creating a curriculum for the core competency development affects the early childhood children’s conceptual innovation development. As the teachers and childcare providers in Chiang Mai Education Sandbox were found that the main components of the curriculum have 6 modules. It is a quality course with the highest overall quality assessment results 3. The curriculum application revealed that the creation of curriculum has an overall effectiveness index higher than .50 4. Creating an academic management model to support the development of teachers’ competency indicates that there are 4 phases of action 1) is to fulfill through hands-on practice. 2) is hand-on practice and building a learning community, 3) offers special guidance, and 4) reflects the thought leading to productivity and feedback 5. An academic management model, by overall opinions points out that teachers have better performance development results and meet the criteria.

References

Chulakorn Masatienwong. (2006). Future-oriented educational policies and strategiesfor Thai youths. Chulalongkorn University: Bangkok

Equitable Education Fund. (2018). Positive Thinking: The seed of Prosperity. National Education Council: Bangkok. Equitable Education Fund

Kantawan Meesomsarn. (2017). Models of Early Childhood Teacher Development in the 21st Century. Valaya Alongkorn Review. 7(2), 45-56.

Keung, C. P. C., et al. (2020). Kindergarten teachers’ perceptions of whole-child development: The roles of leadership practices and professional learning communities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 875–892.

Kiatsuda Srisuk et al. (2020). A Development of Early Childhood Teachers, Child Care Providers, and Assistant Teachers Indicators. (Research Report). Chiang Mai: Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University.

Napanet Thammaboworn. (1999). Evaluation of Early Childhood Development. Nakhon Pathom: Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat Institute.

OECD. (2019). The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and teacher education for diversity.

Pachoen Kidrakarn. (2003). Effectiveness Index. Faculty of Education. Mahasarakham University: Mahasarakham.

Pasin Taengchuang. (2011). Model of Competency Development of Educational Personnel. Bangkok: Duangkamon Publishing.

Polly, D. et al. Designing Curriculum-Based Mathematics Professional Development for Kindergarten Teachers. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 659–669 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0810-1

Saroj Buasri. (2001). Moral, Ethics and Professional Code of Conduct. Bangkok: Yellow

Siripat Jesadawiroj. (2007). Development of an Integrated Curriculum for Primary School Students. Bangkok: Printing House of Chulalongkorn University

Warali Kosai, et al.. (2018). Early Childhood Teacher Development Model Using STEM Education Experience Promote Early Childhood Learning Skills in the 21st Century. Academic Journal of Buriram Rajabhat University. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences. 10(2), 123-142.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-02

How to Cite

Srisuk, K. . (2022). PROPOSALS EXPANSION FOR THE REFORM OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHERS, CHILD CARE PROVIDERS, AND ASSISTANT TEACHERS’ PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS: CHIANG MAI EDUCATION SANDBOX. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 11(3), 333–351. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/258073