NEW CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT OF THAI PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE NEW NORMAL
Keywords:
New Context of Development, AI in Thai Public Administration, the New NormalAbstract
This academic article aimed to study public administration in a new context with the development of public administration under the new normal. Many countries have adopted it in the administration of their own public affairs. Currently, the national administration recognizes global citizenship. Global Governance Sustainable development ideas, content-based democracy, and emerging diseases. These ideas and principles are not limited to the citizens of the country. Also across countries that take into account global citizenship.
Thai public administration should develop the administration of state affairs in 4 parts as follows: 1) in academics, had to change the curriculum focusing on the comparative study of national administration both regional and international, especially the comparative study of the country's public administration system that had been successful in developing the country,2) to apply AI digital technology in the processes of government administration to have an automated nature (AI in government) that connected all government information with the ability to interact between people and government as a real human in interaction 3) research had focused on using research results to development of administration rather than development administration as it was, Which aimed to create a theory of public administration to have global good governance and 4)the practice of government organizations required education, training, exchange of knowledge amongst organizations, government, private and international organizations. If public administration be able to operate in all 4 parts, it would create the administration of Thai government to be accepted both nationally and internationally.
References
จักรกฤษณ์ นรนิติผดุงการ. (2559).วิชารัฐประศาสนศาสตร์ในประเทศไทย: การก่อเกิดการขยายตัวและข้อคิดเกี่ยวกับอนาคต.วารสารด้านการบริหารรัฐกิจและการเมือง, 5(1), 198-210.
นิธิสาร พงศ์ปิยะไพบูลย์. (2563). คว้าโอกาสปฏิรูปโครงสร้างเศรษฐกิจไทย. สืบค้น 29 กันยายน 2564, จาก https://shorturl.asia/3l1ua
Appleby, P. H. (1949). Policy and administration. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alablama Press.
Brinkerhoff, D. W.(2008). The State and International Development Management: Shifting Tides,Changing Boundaries, and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 985-1001.
Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509-522.
Fayol, H. (1916). “Administration Industrielle et generale”. Bulletin de la Societe de l’Industrie Minerale, fifth series, 10(3), 5-162.
Fitzpatrick, J. et al. (2011). A New Look at Comparative Public Administration: Trend in Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administtation Review, 71(6), 821-830.
Goodnow, F. J. (1960). Politics and administration. New York: Macmillan.
Gordon, G. J. (1978). Public Administration in America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Gulick, L. (1937). "Notes on the Theory of Organization". cited in Gulick, Luther; Urwick, Lyndall (ed). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
Gulrajani, N. & Moloney K. (2012). Globalizing Public Administration: Today’s Research and Tomorrow’s Agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78-86.
Henry, N. (1980). Public Administration and Public Affairs. New York: Prentice-Hall.
______. (1975). Public administration and public affairs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Herndon, W. H. and Welk, J. W. (1892). Abraham Lincoln: The True Story of A Great Life. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Jreisat, J. E. (2012). Globalism and Comparative Public Administration. New York: CRC Press.
Leiserson, A. & Morstein M. (1959). The Study of Public Administration In Elements of Public Administration, ed.F. Morstein Marx, 23-48. 2nd ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Martinsen, D.S. & Jorgensen, T.B. (2010). Accountability as a Differentiated Value in Supranational Governance. American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 742-760.
Meier, K. J. (2007). The Public Administration of Politics,or What Political Science could Learn from Public Administration, PS : Poltical Science and Politics, 40(1), 3-9.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. M.A.: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
Riggs, F.W. (1980). The Ecology and Context of Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Public Administration Review, 40(2), 107-115.
Verhoest, K. et al. (2011). Government Agencies: Practices and Lessions from 30 Countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of public administration. Political Science. Quarterly, 1(2), 197-222.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of MCU Social Science Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of MCU Journal of Social Sciences. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.
