SELF-REFLEXIVITY AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL DIMENSION IN THE TEACHINGS OF AJAHN CHAH
Keywords:
Thai Forest Tradition, monastic practice, meditation, mindfulness, selfreflexivity, deconstructionAbstract
This paper analyzes the philosophical dimension of self-reflexivity as reflected in the teachings and practices of the Thai Forest Tradition monks, especially in the teachings of Ajahn Chah (Phra Bodhinyana Thera). Regular practice of meditation, strict adherence to the vinaya, or monastic disciplinary codes, a highly regimented life-style founded on austerity in living conditions, have made the Forest Tradition monks accomplished meditation masters. Their collected teachings form a corpus of guidelines for the cultivation of mental well-being and
reflexive thinking that have inspired the Buddhist and the non-Buddhist alike, from prison inmates in the West to monastics and lay devotees in Southeast Asia. A mindful deconstruction of dichotomous thought-processes has been rigorously put into practice by almost all the Forest Tradition monks. As for instance, in the teachings of Ajahn Chah it is not just language, but the human Ego in all its kammic dimensions – linguistic, ethico-spiritual, and socio-cultural orientations – get dismantled time and again, as do all dualistic mental states arising from attachment to ‘me’ and ‘mine’, ‘Self’ and the ‘Other’. By consciously defying reification of all mental formations, conditioned states, dichotomous predilections and
conventional signs – be it the written word in its varied embodied textuality, or a concept in its mere conceptuality – the simple, direct, and profound teachings bring to the fore the effectual significance of cultivation of self-reflexivity in daily life.
References
Monastery.
Ajahn Sumedho. (1984). Cittaviveka – Teachings from the Silent Mind. Hertfordshire:
Amaravati Publications.
Kornfield, Jack and Breiter, Paul, ed. (1985). A Still Forest Pool – The Insight
Meditation of Achaan Chah. Illinois: The Theosophical Publishing House.
Jaware, Aniket. (2001). Simplifications. New Delhi: Orient Longman Lt.
Magliola, Robert. (1984). Derrida on the Mend. West Lafayette: Purdue University
Press,.
Mahanta, Dipti. (2012). Deconstruction deconstructed: A study of Ajahn Chah in the
light of Derridean philosophy. Research monograph, Bangkok: Buddhist
Research Institute.
Mahasi Sayadaw. (1996). The Great Discourse on Not Self (Anattālakkhana Sutta).
Bangkok: Buddhadhamma Foundation.
Park, Jin Y. ed. (2006). Buddhisms and Deconstructions (New Frameworks for
Continental Philosophy). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
______________(2010). Buddhism and Postmodernity: Zen, Huayan, and the
Possibility of Postmodern Ethics. Lexington Books.
Rahula, Walpola. What the Buddha Taught. Bangkok: Haw Trai Foundation, 1990.
Wang, Youru ed. (2007). Deconstruction and the Ethical in Asian Thought. New York:
Routledge
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of MCU Journal of Social Sciences. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.