THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE: TRANSPARENCY PRINCIPLES IN DUSIT DISTRICT, BANGKOK.

Authors

  • Phusit Phukamchanoad Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Keywords:

public participation, way of democratic, good governance, Transparency, urban community

Abstract

This research aims to explore the public participation in the area development activities, political activities and public activities organized by the governmental agencies for the citizens. It also studies the public attitudes on the public and private sectors’ operations, and analyzes each community in order to select model communities and develop the communities based on good governance: transparency in all communities. The data was collected from 400 samples residing in 46 communities located in Dusit district, Bangkok and 60 samples outside the communities; therefore, there were 460 samples used as the unit of analysis in total. Moreover, there were interviews with 46 community leaders. The research results showed that the public participation in the area development activities and public activities conducted by governmental agencies for the citizens was overall rated at moderate level. In terms of the analytical planning for area development, there was the least amount of public participation.  Regarding the participation in political activities over the past five years, the samples believed that they had freedom and rights to living to the full extent, but they did not have freedom of assembly; during assembly activities, there were always soldiers and governmental officers observing them. Nonetheless, the samples had clear attitudes towards political activities and Thai democratic governance due to the fact that the samples gave importance to the confidence and admiration in constitutional democracy and believed that it could sustainably solve the country’s problems and suit Thailand’s governance at true or high level, with the highest mean. Next, the statement in which the patronage system or interdependency is still a common practice in Thai society was rated at true level as well. Simultaneously, the samples were confident in the transparency-related good governance the most when the activities involved the collaboration with private organizations or external publicly academic sector. Community leaders and committees had shared information with the public and allowed the inclusive participation in the communities. As for the factors affecting the democratic way of life such as gender, income and being a member of a social group.

References

Arithat Kaewkosaba. (2017). Good Governance Principles in The Constitution of The Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. Academic Article Hot Issue Of the Secretariat of The House of Representatives, July 2017, pp. 1-5.

Cohen, J. & Uphoff, N. (1980). Participation's place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, (8), pp. 213-235.

Department of Local Administration Ministry of the Interior. (2012). A Guide to Good Corporate Governance Principles of the local government organization. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Community of Thailand.

Moral and transparency assessment center of government agencies (2018). Integrity and Transparency Assessment (ITA). Bangkok: Office of the National Counter Corruption Commission.

Nattarin Chaloemritthiwat. (2016). Local Political Participation Among Women in Chum Saeng Municipality, Amphoe Wang Chan, Rayong Province. Major: Public and Private Management; M.P.A. (Public and Private Management) Burapha University.

Office of Political Development Council King Prajadhipok's Institute. (2011). Citizenship Research Report: Academic Document No. 54-01. Bangkok: The Council of Ministers and the Government Gazette.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2011). His Majesty the King's work on national development of the King. Bangkok: Phet Rung Printing Center.

Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2009). A Guide to Organizational Governance Level In accordance with the principles of good governance rating. Bangkok: Premier Pro.

Orathai Pratad.(2015). Participation of Citizens in Community Development in Fort Mahakan, Rattanakosin Island,Thailand. an Independent Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree of Master of Political Science (Public Affairs) Executive Program in Public Affairs Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University.

Pannilai Nitirochana. (2014). People Participation in Community Development of Bangkok Metropolitan: Case Study; Wangthonglang District’s Self-Reliance Community Plan. Master of Arts (Law and Management) National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).

Phusit Phukamchanoad. (2009). The Participation of Community Committee in Sub-community Development in Dusit District, Bangkok. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Phusit Phukamchanoad. (2010). A Political Participation Model of the people in Dusit District, Bangkok. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Phusit Phukamchanoad. (2018). Citizen Participation in Community Development Management for the Social Inequality Mitigation in the Three Poor Cities from the Northern Zone Based on the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Pichai Rattanadilok Na Phuket. (1998). Classes and elections. Bangkok: Wiphasa.

Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2007). The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. available: http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2550/A/047/1.PDF [November 13, 2016]

Sombat Thamrongthanyawong (2006). Thai politics. Bangkok: Sema Dharma.

Thanawith Kangkang. (2003). The Participation of the Community Committee in Developing the Municipal Community in Tambon Samrong Tai, Amphoe Phra Pradaeng, Samut Prakan. Dhonburi Rajabhat University. Office of Academic Resources and Information Technology.

Yamane, Taro. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 3rd ed., Tokyo: Harper.

Published

2019-12-29

How to Cite

Phukamchanoad, P. . . . (2019). THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE: TRANSPARENCY PRINCIPLES IN DUSIT DISTRICT, BANGKOK. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 8(4), 278–293. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/224679