A Gamified Microlearning Model: Effects on Motivation, Attitudes, and English Communication Competencies Among Elementary Education Student Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/jlapsu.2025.15Keywords:
microlearning, gamification, English communication competencies, elementary education student teachersAbstract
The increasing demand for proficient English communication competencies in elementary education highlights the need for instructional approaches that support flexible and focused learning. This study aimed to (1) examine the needs of elementary education student teachers regarding microlearning integrated with gamification, (2) develop a microlearning–gamification learning model to enhance English communication competencies of elementary education student teachers, and (3) evaluate the effects of the developed learning model on attitudes and English communication competencies of elementary education student teachers. A mixed-methods design was employed across three phases: needs assessment, model development, and implementation, involving ten student teachers at Suan Dusit University, Lampang Center. The research instruments consisted of a needs assessment questionnaire, semi-structured interview protocols, a model quality evaluation form, an English achievement test, and an attitude questionnaire. Quantitative data from the needs assessment and attitude questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while learning achievement was examined through the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Qualitative feedback from the needs assessment, attitude questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews was subjected to content analysis to inform model refinement. Findings revealed strong preferences for communicative and task-based approaches emphasizing primary-level content, pronunciation, vocabulary, and realistic classroom scenarios. Participants valued microlearning features such as topic segmentation and frequent comprehension checks, along with gamification elements including goal clarity, scoring, and self-directed progression. The Wilcoxon analysis indicated significant improvement in English communication competencies after model use (Σranks = 55.00, p < .01). Attitude results showed very high satisfaction and motivation (M = 4.68, SD = 0.55), particularly regarding accessibility, goal clarity, and rewards. Overall, the microlearning-gamification model demonstrated strong feasibility and effectiveness in enhancing communication skills and positive attitudes among elementary education student teachers.
References
Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., & Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational gamification vs. game-based learning: Comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.4.659
Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2025). The cognitive and motivational benefits of gamification in English language learning: A systematic review. The Open Psychology Journal, 18(1), Article e18743501359379. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743501359379250305083002
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education ESL.
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
Bruck, P. A., Motiwalla, L., & Foerster, F. (2012). Mobile learning with micro-content: A framework and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 25th Bled eConference (pp. 527-543). University of Maribor Press. https://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2012/
Buchem, I., & Hamelmann, H. (2010). Microlearning: a strategy for ongoing professional development. eLearning Papers, 21(7), 1-15. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ilona-Buchem/publication/341323117_Microlearning_a_strategy_for_ongoing_professional_development/links/5ebabd26a6fdcc90d66ebfbc/Microlearning-a-strategy-for-ongoing-professional-development.pdf
Caporarello, L., Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. (2019). One game does not fit All. Gamification and learning: Overview and future directions. In A. Lazazzara, R. Nacamulli, C. Rossignoli & S. Za (Eds.), Organizing for Digital Innovation (pp. 179-188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90500-6_14
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9-15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farrell, T. S. (2018). Reflective language teaching: Practical applications for TESOL teachers. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
García, J. M. N. (2006). TEFL in secondary education: Handbook and workbook. Porta Linguarum, 6, 129-133. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/30666
Gawlik, K., Guo, J., Tan, A., & Overcash, J. (2021). Incorporating a microlearning wellness intervention into nursing student curricula. Nurse Educator, 46(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000842
Gee, J. P. (2015). Literacy and education. Routledge.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
Hosseini, H. M., Ejtehadi, A., & Hosseini, M. M. (2020). Flipping microlearning-based EFL classroom to enhance learners' self-regulation. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.20.03
Hug, T. (2005). Micro learning and narration: Exploring possibilities of utilization of narrations and storytelling for the designing of “micro units” and didactical micro-learning arrangements. In MiT4: The Work of Stories, Proceedings of the Fourth Media in Transition Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States. https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/5df66a7c55ce687a25cbd05a2be6a785
Javorcik, T., Kostolanyova, K., & Havlaskova, T. (2023). Microlearning in the education of future teachers: Monitoring and evaluating students’ activity in a microlearning course. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 21(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Khamkhien, A. (2010). Teaching English speaking and English-speaking tests in the Thai context: A reflection from Thai perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p184
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941100100030608
Lai, C., & Li, X. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 498-521. https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2024). ICT efficacy and response to different needs in university classrooms: Effects on attitudes and active behaviour towards technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(1), 350-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09357-2
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Ljubas, S., & Topalović, M. D. (2024). TEFL to adult learners with a focus on communicative language teaching (CLT). Zbornik radova Međimurskog veleučilišta u Čakovcu, 15(1), 16-25. https://hrcak.srce.hr/318652
Luo, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of gamified tools for foreign language learning (FLL): A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040331
MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affective factors in foreign language learning (pp. 24-45). McGraw-Hill.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mostrady, A., Sanchez-Lopez, E., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, A. F. (2024). Microlearning and its effectiveness in modern education: A mini review. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i1.496
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5
Prasittichok, P., & Smithsarakarn, P. N. (2024). The effects of microlearning on EFL students’ English speaking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.27
Putri Septiani, A., & Rosmansyah, Y. (2021). Features, frameworks, and benefits of gamified microlearning: A systematic literature review. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology (pp. 130-135). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468978.3469000
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52-66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation. Educational Technology.
Reiser, B. J., & Tabak, I. (2014). Scaffolding. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 44-62). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139519526.005
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Roskowski, S. M., Wolcott, M. D., Persky, A. M., Rhoney, D. H., & Williams, C. R. (2023). Assessing the use of microlearning for preceptor development. Pharmacy, 11(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11030102
Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 2(2), 49-60.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Shank, P. (2017). Practice and feedback for deeper learning: 26 evidence-based and easy-to-apply tactics that promote deeper learning and application. Learning sPeaks.
Sirwan Mohammed, G., Wakil, K., & Sirwan Nawroly, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of microlearning to improve students’ learning ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415824
Songsirisak, P., Jitpranee, J., Lisec, A., Boonjanawiroj, P., Wetpichetkosol, B., & Kantamas, K. (2022). Chinese students' metaphorical descriptions of Thai teachers at a Thai university. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8
Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Ten Cate, D., Dikken, J., Ettema, R. G., Schoonhoven, L., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2023). Development of a microlearning intervention regarding nursing nutritional care for older adults: A multi-methods study. Nurse Education Today, 120, Article 105623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105623
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Van Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research Update, 35. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Wongsothorn, A., Hiranburana, K., & Chinnawongs, S. (2002). English language teaching in Thailand today. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220210
Wright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for language learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, S., & Hasim, Z. (2023). Gamification in EFL/ESL instruction: A systematic review of empirical research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1030790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030790
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rattana Klinjuy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright to their article but the Journal of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University reserves the exclusive rights to first publication.
