India's Digital Sovereignty: Lessons for Developing Nations in Balancing Security, Civil Rights, and Economic Sovereignty

Authors

  • Kiatanantha Lounkaew Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Thailand
  • Tanongsak Siriyong Miles Consulting Group Co.,Ltd. , Thailand
  • Natthakit Suksamran Miles Consulting Group Co.,Ltd. , Thailand

Keywords:

Digital sovereignty, digital economy, cybersecurity, digital rights, technological independence

Abstract

This article analyzes India's pursuit of digital sovereignty as a case study for developing nations in balancing security, civil rights, and economic sovereignty. The study finds that India's approach is characterized by three key features: domestic data localization requirements to prevent foreign access, particularly from the United States, development of domestic digital infrastructure such as UPI and Aadhaar, and protection of critical digital assets from foreign control. India attempts to establish a third way between the US market-driven approach and China's state-centric approach. However, implementation faces challenges in policy execution, establishing economic balance among stakeholders, and addressing civil rights concerns. Based on this case study, the article recommends that developing nations should prioritize developing modern and flexible legal frameworks, building regional cooperation to increase bargaining power, promoting sovereign digital infrastructure development, and establishing mechanisms to balance state control with civil rights. India's experience provides valuable lessons for establishing sustainable digital sovereignty aligned with democratic principles.

References

Autolitano, S., & Pawlowska, A. (2021). Europe's quest for digital sovereignty: GAIA-X as a case study. Istituto Affari Internazionali.

Belli, L. (2023). Building good digital sovereignty through digital public infrastructures and digital commons in India and Brazil. Retrieved from: https://cyberbrics.info/building-good-digital-sovereignty-through-digital-public-infrastructures-and-digital-commons-in-india-and-brazil

Celeste, E. (2021). Digital Sovereignty in the EU: Challenges and Future Perspectives.

In F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, & J. Quinn (Eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders: Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty (pp. 29–82). Hart Publishing.

Donnelly, S., Ríos Camacho, E., & Heidebrecht, S. (2024). Digital sovereignty as control: The regulation of digital finance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2226-2249. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2332624

Flonk, D., Jachtenfuchs, M., & Obendiek, A. (2024). Controlling internet content in the EU: towards digital sovereignty. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2316–2342. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2024.2309179

Floridi, L (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 369-378. DOI: 10.1080/13510347. 2023.2197217

Gromova, E., & Brantes Ferreira, D. (2024). On the way to BRICS+ digital sovereignty: Opportunities and challenges of a new era. BRICS Law Journal, 11(3), 54-69. DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-3-54-69

Gupta, S., & Sony, R. A. L. (2021). Quest of data colonialism and cyber sovereignty: India's strategic position in cyberspace. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 2, 68-81. DOI: 10.17323/2713-2749.2021.2.68.81

Heidebrecht, S. (2024). From market liberalism to public intervention: Digital sovereignty and changing European union digital single market governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(1), 205-223. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13488

Hoeffler, C., & Mérand, F. (2024). Digital sovereignty, economic ideas, and the struggle over the digital markets act: A political-cultural approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2121-2146. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2294144

Leese, M. (2024). Staying in control of technology: predictive policing, democracy, and digital sovereignty. Democratization, 31(5), 963-978. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2197217

Lehuedé, S. (2024). An alternative planetary future? Digital sovereignty frameworks and the decolonial option. Big Data & Society, 11(1). DOI: 10.1177/20539517231221778

Moerel, L., & Timmers, P. (2021). Reflections on digital sovereignty. EU Cyber Direct, Research in Focus series 2021. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3772777

Monsees, L., & Lambach, D. (2022). Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity. European Security, 31(3), 377-394. DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2101883

Pohle, J., & Santaniello, M. (2024). From multistakeholderism to digital sovereignty: Toward a new discursive order in internet governance? Policy & Internet, 1-20. DOI:10.1002/poi3.426

Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9(4).), 1-4. DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1532

Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Casolari, F., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies. Internet Policy Review, 10(3). DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1575

Sheikh, H. (2022). European Digital Sovereignty: A layered approach. Digital Society, 1, 25. DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00025-z

Vila Seoane, M. F. (2021). Data securitisation: The challenges of data sovereignty in India. Third World Quarterly, 42(8), 1733-1750. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Lounkaew, K., Siriyong, T., & Suksamran, N. (2024). India’s Digital Sovereignty: Lessons for Developing Nations in Balancing Security, Civil Rights, and Economic Sovereignty . Journal of Innovation in Business, Management, and Social Sciences, 5(3), 25–44. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jibim/article/view/283913

Issue

Section

Academic Articles