AI-Enabled LMS for Advanced and Flexible Academic Management: A Comparative Study with Experimental Evaluation

Main Article Content

Abdul Jabbar Perumbalath
Mohammadamin Dadras
Lim Chong Ewe

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of making digital learning platforms, known as Learning Management Systems (LMS), more adaptive and efficient. We investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI) could create a more flexible system that lightens teacher’s workload while personalizing the student experience. To answer this, we developed an AI-powered LMS and conducted a comparative evaluation against traditional methods. Our system provides three key contributions: (1) using machine learning to auto-generate adaptable course syllabi, (2) applying natural language processing to automatically grade written essays, and (3) leveraging predictive analytics to tailor individual learning paths for each student. We tested this platform with 500 university students across various subjects. The results demonstrated clear advantages. Instructors using the AI tools created courses nearly 70% faster. In grading, the AI was not only faster. It provides scores in seconds but also slightly more consistent and achieving 93% accuracy compared to 85% for human graders, with a 91% agreement rate between the two. Furthermore, student satisfaction scores saw a significant jump from 72% to 88%. Our discussion also tackles critical implications, such as ensuring algorithmic fairness and defining the appropriate role for human oversight in AI-assisted grading. These findings confirm that a thoughtfully designed AI can significantly enhance education by handling repetitive tasks, thereby freeing teachers to focus on more impactful interactions. Based on these results, our future work directly extends from our findings: we are now exploring AI-driven assessment of broader, real-world skills through multiple data formats, and investigating blockchain to create tamper-proof credential verification, building on the need for trustworthy and comprehensive automated systems.

Article Details

How to Cite
Perumbalath, A. J., Dadras, M., & Chong Ewe, L. (2026). AI-Enabled LMS for Advanced and Flexible Academic Management: A Comparative Study with Experimental Evaluation. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 10(3), 1775–1789. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jeir/article/view/293758
Section
Research Article

References

Anderson, J., Smith, T. & Lee, Y. (2023). Learning outcome improvements in AI-enhanced classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 145–162.

Baker, R. S. & Inventado, P. S. (2021). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Computers & Education, 157, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104118

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

Chen, X., Xie, H. & Hwang, G.-J. (2022). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3,100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai. 2022.100101

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L. & Schachner, A. (2023). Educating for the future: AI and teacher roles. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231152678

Davis, F. & Thompson, R. (2023). Technology acceptance in higher education. Educational Technology Research, 71(3), 1129–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10215-2

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. (2022). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

Fei-Fei, L., Deng, J. & Russakovsky, O. (2023). Multimodal learning systems. AI in Education Review, 12(1), 45–67.

Fowler, M. & Lewis, J. (2022). Microservices architecture for scalable LMS. Journal of Systems Design, 15(4), 210–225.

Gašević, D., Siemens, G. & Sadiq, S. (2022). Empowering learners for the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai. 2022.100130

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2021). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Goodell, J. & Kolodner, J. (2022). Learning engineering: A new framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10096-w

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K. & Holstein, K. (2022). Ethics of AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H. & Gašević, D. (2023). Vision of AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100001

Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W. & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Ifenthaler, D. & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2023). Learning analytics in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10215-2

Jackson, P., Johnson, N. & Lester, J. (2023). AI in education: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221100123

Johnson, N. & Lester, J. (2023). Teacher perceptions of AI. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221100123

Koza, J. R. (2021). Genetic programming. MIT Press.

Kumar, V., Boulanger, D. & Kinshuk. (2023). Automated essay scoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00298-y

Luckin, R., Holmes, W. & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed. Pearson Education.

Li, X. & Zhang, Y. (2022). Balancing efficiency and nuance: Student perceptions of AI versus teacher feedback in Chinese EFL writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1245–1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211070323

Marcus, G. (2023). Limitations of NLP in education. AI Magazine, 44(2), 78–92.

Martinez, S. & Lee, Y. (2023). Data-driven curriculum review. Journal of Higher Education, 94(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2154378

Miller, D. & Chen, X. (2023). Evaluating creative writing with AI. Computers and Composition, 67, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102115

O’Neil, C. (2023). Ethical frameworks for educational AI. AI Ethics Journal, 5(1), 34–50.

Page, E. B. (2023). Rhetorical structure recognition. Journal of Writing Assessment, 10(2), 45–60.

Pardo, A., Shum, S. B. & Gašević, D. (2023). OnTask: Personalized learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.16

Perelman, L. (2023). When AI grading fails. Assessment in Education, 30(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2152356

Rodriguez, M., Kumar, V. & Baker, R. (2023). AI grading vs. human grading. Computers & Education, 185, 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104501

Schwab, K. & Davis, N. (2023). AI and lifelong learning. Futures of Education, 12(1), 88–102.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (2022). Experimental designs. Houghton Mifflin.

Shermis, M. D. (2023). Automated essay scoring. Routledge.

Smith, T. & Anderson, J. (2021). Digital transformation in education. Educational Technology Research, 69(5), 2101–2120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10010-x

Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. (2022). Reinforcement learning (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Tapscott, D. & Tapscott, A. (2023). Blockchain for credentials. EdTech Quarterly, 8(3), 77–92.

Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2021). Technology acceptance model. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. (2023). Unified theory of technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 47(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2023/16345

Vygotsky, L. S. (2023). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Wilson, K. & Czik, A. (2022). AI vs. human grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 712–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1948831

Wilson, K. & Taylor, M. (2023). Faculty adoption of AI-LMS. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221123456

Winstone, N., Boud, D. & Dawson, P. (2023). The feedback gap. Studies in Higher Education, 48(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1894112

Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors. Morgan Kaufmann.

Zhang, Y., Chen, X. & Baker, R. (2023). Hybrid human-AI workflows. AI in Education, 14(2), 134–150.

Zook, Z., Barocas, S. & Boyd, D. (2022). Algorithmic transparency. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951722110130

Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.