Models for Enhancing Work Efficiency of Academic Staff in Private Higher Education Institutions

Main Article Content

Jibing Liu
Sarotchini Siriwattana
Xin Liu

Abstract

This research was established to evaluate the significance of perceived organizational support, internal processes, learning and growth, and performance efficiency among academic staff in Thai private higher education institutions, while also investigating the mediating role of learning and growth between both organizational support and internal processes regarding performance outcomes. The study gathered data from a sample of 300 academic personnel and employed comprehensive statistical methods, including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and structural equation modeling for deep-dive analysis.
The findings reveal that while personnel perceive organizational support at a moderate level with job security being the most highlighted factor their actual performance efficiency is rated at a high level, particularly in terms of specialized job knowledge. Interestingly, the study found that differences in personal demographics do not result in significant variations in performance efficiency. Among the various dimensions of support, emotional encouragement emerged as the most influential driver of efficiency, followed by the quality of working conditions.
Consequently, it is recommended that university administrators focus on fostering emotional connections by actively recognizing and celebrating staff achievements. By utilizing platforms such as institutional journals, award ceremonies, or public commendations to honor outstanding work, institutions can instill a sense of professional pride and dedication, which ultimately serves as a catalyst for enhanced organizational performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Liu, J., Siriwattana, S., & Liu, X. (2026). Models for Enhancing Work Efficiency of Academic Staff in Private Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 10(3), 1980–1997. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jeir/article/view/292289
Section
Research Article

References

Abbas, Z. (2014) Identification of Factors and Their Impact on Employees’ Training and Organizational Performance in Pakistan. Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), KASBIT Business Journals, 7, 93-109.

Christian, W.W. (2021). Understanding Employee Performance During Work from Home in Indonesia, The Journal of Behavioral Science,16(3), 99–108. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/IJBS/ article/view/251643

Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Psychology Press.

Eisenberger, R., et al. (1986) Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Hermina, U.N. & Yosepha, S.Y. (2019) The Model of Employee Performance May 2019.International Review of Management and Marketing 9(3), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8025

Kumari, R., Dubey, R.C. & Kumar, S. (2018) Antibacterial Efficacy of Acetone Soluble Oil of Azadirachta indica on Some Bacterial Strains. Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology, 09(08),1-3, https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000447

Mikula, B., Maček, N. & Sušjan, A. (2020). Corporate reputation: An interdisciplinary systematic review of the literature and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.043

Srisawat, W. (2020). Global University Rankings and Implications for Thai Universities. Journal of Business, Economics and Communications 15,(3),1-12, https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ BECJournal/article/view/235779

Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2005). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (pp. 1–25). John Wiley & Sons.

QS Quacquarelli Symonds. (2020). Who uses university rankings and are they important? https://www.qs.com/who-uses-rankings-and-how-do-they-affect-decisions/

Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2023). Organization structure: Office of the Permanent Secretary. https://ops.mhesi.go.th/en/inter-about-ops-mhesi/organization-structure

Rokim, M. & Tentama, F. (2020). The employee’s performance: A study of construct validity and reliability. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 72(1), 90–100. https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/6183

Santhanam, N., Kamalanabhan, T. J. & Dyaram, L. (2015). Examining the moderating effects of organizational identification between human resource practices and employee turnover intentions in Indian hospitality industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 14(3), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2015.1008384

Tantua, E. & Nwimana, V. N. (2020). Job design and employee performance of manufacturing companies in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Economics, 8(1), 55–62. https://arcnjournals.org/images/NIRA-IJBE-8-1-5.pdf

Triansyah, A. F., Hejin, W. & Stefania, S. (2023). Factors affecting employee performance: A systematic review. Journal Markcount Finance, 1(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.55849/jmf.v1i3.102

The Office of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation Development and Promotion. (2022). University transformation project (Reinventing University). https://www.ops.go.th/en/flagship-project-driven/item/6522-reinventing-university

Yuvaraj, S. & Nadheya, R. (2018). A study on the role of technology on employee behaviour and their performance. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(7), 244–251. http://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJMET/VOLUME_9_ISSUE_7/IJMET_09_07_028.pdf

Wijayanto, A. & Riani, A. L. (2021). Business ethics and organizational performance: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(2), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04545-1