The Development of Instructional Guidelines Based on the TPACK Framework to Promote Being a Writer in Upper Secondary School Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
This Article aimed to study (1) the design of instructional guidelines based on the TPACK framework to promote being a writer, and (2) the development and quality evaluation of instructional guidelines based on the TPACK framework to promote being a writer among upper secondary school students. The sample consisted of seven experts in curriculum and instruction, Thai language, educational technology, and assessment and evaluation. They were selected through purposive sampling. The instruments used for data collection were (1) a data recording form and (2) an assessment form to evaluate the appropriateness and feasibility of the developed approach. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. The research results were as follows; 1. The design of the instructional guidelines based on the TPACK framework covered three types of writing: opinion writing, argumentative writing, and persuasive writing. It also incorporated both teacher-dependent and independent instructional strategies, as well as the use of electronic and non-electronic technologies, resulting in 12 instructional guidelines. 2. The developed and quality evaluation instructional guidelines, comprising titles, learning outcomes, unit descriptions, instructional processes, learning materials, and assessment and evaluation methods, were rated as highly appropriate and feasible. It was indicated that the TPACK-based instructional model could be effectively used to enhance writing skills in upper secondary school students.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bai, J. (2024). The discussion of communicative language teaching in language classrooms. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 4(2), 1–4.
Chaiveeradech, M. (2021). Bridging digital media literacy with the Thai context of “Sati” [Doctoral dissertation, Bournemouth University].
Chu, N. L. & Soutter, M. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge framework as a lens for transformative social and emotional learning online: A perspective. In Cases on practical applications for remote, hybrid, and hyflex teaching (pp. 1–17). IGI Global.
Cohen, L. E. & Waite-Stupiansky, S. (2022). Theories of early childhood education: Developmental, behaviorist, and critical (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Deerubram, K. & Phuengphet, S. (2022). The development of Thai reading and writing achievements for communication in daily life and satisfaction with the cooperative learning CIRC technique of Prathomsuksa 2 students. Journal of Innovation in Educational Management and Research, 4(2), 253–266.
Fang, F., Injoungjirakit, N., Sridama, P. & Teekasap, S. (2024). TPACK ability test for junior college teacher internship students in primary school Chinese. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 4(4), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2024.276487
Khammani, T. (2023). The art of teaching: Knowledge for effective learning process management (26th ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Khlichaya, P. (2020). Thai people’s engagement, risk from social media and competence in digital intelligence and literacy. Journal of Communication Arts, 38(3), 1–16.
McCulloch, G. (2024). Internet has encouraged our writing, linguist says. The Times. https://shorturl.asia/4PjLB
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2023). Summary report of the O-NET examination results for Grade 12, academic year 2022. https://www.niets.or.th/ th/content/view/25620
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2024). Summary report of the O-NET examination results for Grade 12, academic year 2023. https://www.niets.or.th/th/content/view/26333
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2025). Summary report of the O-NET examination results for Grade 12, academic year 2024. https://www.niets.or.th/th/content/view/26589
Nurjanah, L. & Nurbatra, L. H. (2023). The power of PBL and TPACK: Catalysts for elevating students’ writing learning outcomes. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 157–166.
Economic Statistics Division, National Statistical Office. (2024). The 2024 household survey on the use of information and communication technology (Quarter 4). National Statistical Office.
Pahe, S. (2022). Online education: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Khumnum.
Schmid, M. & Petko, D. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge as a guiding model for media education competence. MedienPädagogik: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education, 17(1), 121–140.
Srisaard, B. (2017). Basic research (10th ed.). Suweeriyasarn.
Srisukong, A., & Buaraphan, K. (2021). Development of the instructional model for reading and writing in English: TPACK-KWL Plus model. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 44(1), 107–122.
Tanya, S. (2018). Educational assessment. Suweeriyasarn.
Toșa, C., Paneru, C. P., Joudavi, A. & Tarigan, A. K. M. (2024). Digital transformation, incentives, and pro-environmental behaviour: Assessing the uptake of sustainability in companies’ transition towards circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 47, 632–643.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F. & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343.
Usman, S., Arafah, B., Marhum, M., Munir, S. & Tadeko, N. (2024). The effect of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on rural area students’ English writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(3), 884–892.
Wardani, H. K. (2022). Technology pedagogy content knowledge (TPACK): Analisis konsep & model pembelajaran. Basa: Journal of Language & Literature, 2(1), 32–47.
Ware, P. D. & Warschauer, M. (2020). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–10.
Wu, Y. & Cui, Y. (2022). Reflections on the teaching reform of art theory courses from the perspective of connectivism. Frontiers in Art Research, 4(1), 47–53.
Xu, J. & Phongsatha, S. (2024). Determinants of physical teachers’ attitude toward technology integration in Shenzhen schools, China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.3541
Yanti, L. & Said, I. (2024). Teacher’s strategies for implementing TPACK in teaching writing: A case study at a technical vocational school in Malangbong. Journal of English Education Program, 11(2), 139–146.
Zhang, M. & Fang, X. (2022). Exploring university EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and teacher efficacy in technology-integrated flipped classroom. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221117860
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C.-H. & Chang, C. (2021). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 553–595. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211002054