Collaborative Governance in Developing the Social Quality of life of the People of Bang Kruai District, Nonthaburi Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to (1) the implementation of collaborative governance in promoting the social dimension of quality-of-life development in Bang Kruai District, Nonthaburi Province. It aims to analyze the structures and processes of collaboration. (2) identify institutional and operational challenges,
(3) propose strategies to strengthen participatory mechanisms for sustainable local development. Employing a qualitative research design, the study drew on document analysis and in-depth interviews with 55 key informants, including ex-officio members of the District Quality of Life Development Committee and representatives from the civic sector. Data were interpreted through a descriptive-analytical approach, grounded in theories of collaborative governance and networked governance.
The results of the study revealed that (1) the district’s development framework operates under the Regulation of the Office of the Prime Minister on Area-Based Quality of Life Development (B.E. 2561). The district chief exercised legal authority in tandem with facilitative leadership to convene and coordinate multi-sectoral actors around shared goals. Through resource integration and horizontal collaboration, a functional network emerged-responsive to local needs and capable of sustaining collective action. (2)Despite these efforts, the study uncovered notable gaps. Some committee members lacked conceptual clarity regarding the principles of social quality-of-life development, particularly with respect to citizen-centered planning and community well-being. Activities were often misaligned with participatory ideals, undermining the effectiveness of local initiatives. (3) The development guidelines should therefore increase the potential of the district quality of life development committee to be aware of the operating mechanisms. To jointly determine roles and responsibilities, using the people's network to provide true health information. Collaborate to find the cause of the problem, solutions, and follow up on the work to ensure continuity and sustainability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Archanuphap, S., Weerawong, T., & Yanana, T. (2014). District health system drive (DHSO) and district health system (DHS): Thailand edition (in Thai).
Chaisirirak, K. (2011). The leadership path to success. Kilenkanphim.
Chansamorn, S. (2016). Network collaboration with the structure of a community of coexistence and accessibility in ASEAN: A case study of Koh Kret model community, Nonthaburi Province [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University].
Kariji, K. (2018). Collaborative governance in the sustainable employment industrial project in the three southern border provinces of Thailand [Master’s thesis, National Institute of Development Administration].
Office of the Prime Minister. (2018). Regulations of the Office of the Prime Minister on the development of quality of life at the local level (B.E. 2561) (in Thai).
Parinyasuthinan, U. (2019). Public policy and Bang Riang community: Success and sustainability of policy implementation. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 91–120.
Srisompong, W. (2016). Collaborative management in the Khlong Mon Na project, Ram Daeng Subdistrict, Singhanakhon District, Songkhla Province [Master of Public Administration thesis, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus].
