Development of Cultural Geography to Promote Buddhist Tourism of Temples in Muang District, Kanchanaburi Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aims to 1) study the cultural geography in promoting Buddhist tourism at temples in Mueang District, Kanchanaburi Province, 2) design and develop the cultural geography to promote Buddhist tourism at temples in Mueang District, Kanchanaburi Province, and 3) extract lessons learned from Buddhist tourism landscape architecture at temples in Mueang District, Kanchanaburi Province. The findings reveal that the development of cultural geography to promote Buddhist tourism in Mueang District, Kanchanaburi Province, integrates nature, religion, and local culture to create valuable and sustainable tourism experiences. It focuses on allowing visitors to experience peace, faith, and learning about Buddhism within the unique context of the area. The study highlights four important temples: Wat Tham Mangkhon Thong, Wat Tham Khao Laem, Wat Tham Muni Nath, and Wat Tham Khao Pun. Each temple has distinct geographical and cultural features that connect with the local context. The development and design of cultural geography to promote Buddhist tourism consist of six key components: cultural tourism resources, the significance of Buddhism, community economic enhancement, tourist services, community participation, and raising awareness among stakeholders. The extraction of lessons and the creation of a Buddhist tourism network is termed "The Landscape of Temple Tourism According to the Four Noble Truths." The temples are categorized based on the Four Noble Truths: Wat Tham Mangkhon Thong (Dukkha), Wat Tham Khao Laem (Samudaya), Wat Tham Muni Nath (Nirodha), and Wat Tham Khao Pun (Magga). This framework helps ensure that the development of cultural geography can preserve and promote cultural and historical values, while also encouraging learning about Buddhism, ultimately fostering faith and accumulating merit for future visitors.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Apakaro, S. (2558). Networks: Nature, Knowledge, and Management. Phisit Thai Offset.
Chuaythanee, B. et al. (2022).Driving the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy for Livelihood Transformation: From a Market-Dependent Economy to a Self-Sufficient Economy Among Sugarcane and Cassava Farmers in Wichian Buri District, Phetchabun Province [Research Report, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University].
Hamsupho, S. (2000). Population and Quality of Life Development. OS Printing House.
Jitthangwatan, B. (2005). Sustainable Tourism Development. Press and Design Co., Ltd.
Kaewthep, K. (1995). Community Development Tools. Catholic Council of Thailand for Development.
Kanchanaburi Center. (2022). Wat Tham Mangkon Thong. https://shorturl.asia/aKoBq
Kasetsiri, C. (1997). Cultural Tourism. Thailand Research Fund Office.
Nirattatrakul, Y. (1995). ECOTOURISM: Conservation-Oriented Tourism. Tourism Journal, 14(3), 50-58.
Province, K. (2022). Tourist Attractions, Mueang District. https://shorturl.asia/tFhMa
Simpathavan, D. and Inthongpan, P. (2022). Management Models of Buddhist Tourism According to Wat Pa Udom Somporn, Sakon Nakhon Province. Journal of Buddhist Social Sciences and Anthropology, 7(3), 287-301.