Legal Measures Regarding on the Establishment of Administrative Dispute Adjudication Committee

Main Article Content

Puttaraksa Vorravong
Kriangkrai Kanjanakuha

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study the concepts, theories, judgments, legal measures, and related research; 2) study the factual problems and legal problems regarding the establishment of the Office of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee; 3) study, analyze, and compare the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand with the laws of other countries; and 4) apply appropriate legal measures of the country to the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand to be more appropriate. Qualitative research was used by studying documents from legal texts, academic textbooks, articles, and electronic media, along with in-depth interviews with experts. The study found that this research had 4 major problems: 1) Thailand has not established the Office of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee. Therefore, it should be established in accordance with the administrative law of the French Republic. 2) The problem of the right to select persons to act as the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee; outsiders should be given the right to select and appoint the dispute resolution committee, as in the United Kingdom. 3) The problem of conflicting powers and duties of the dispute resolution committees under various laws; the powers and duties should be specified in a separate law. 4) The problem of the procedural issues of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee; the procedural issues for the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee should be developed in accordance with the principles of the United States. The knowledge from this research is that if the law is amended to establish the Office of the Dispute Resolution Committee, it will have a positive effect on administrative operations by potentially increasing the efficiency of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Committee to perform its duties quickly, allowing administrative disputes to end without delay, and also reducing the burden of cases, which will reduce the number of cases that will be brought to the Administrative Court.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vorravong, P., & Kanjanakuha, K. . (2024). Legal Measures Regarding on the Establishment of Administrative Dispute Adjudication Committee. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 8(4), 1790–1804. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jeir/article/view/282530
Section
Research Article

References

Administrative Court. (2002). Executive Summary: Administrative Cases Regarding the Committee Determining Disputes. Administrative Court Office Welfare.

Chaiwat, W. (1996). Administrative justice process. Journal of Administrative Law,15(2),1-92.

Chanchai, S. (2019). Explanation of the Administrative Court Act and the Administrative Court. Winyucon.

Kanjana, N. (2001). Procedural issues of the Information Disclosure Commission. [Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University].

King Prajadhipok's Institute, (2019). Research report on administrative cases related to the decision of the dispute adjudication committee. www.kpi.ac.th/media_kpiacth/pdf/M8_60.pdf

King Prajadhipok's Institute. (2003). Administrative cases concerning the decision of the Dispute Resolution Committee. Bangkok Administrative Court Office Welfare.

Nawapon, C. (1979). The Administrative Disputes Tribunal in the United Kingdom. Administrative Court Academic Journal, Special issue, 239-249.

Nunthawat V. (2008). The Basics of French Administrative Law. Winyucon.

Worajat, P. (2006). Administrative Procedure in the German Legal System. Winyuchon Publishing House.