Productive Instructional Model for Creating Productivity and Innovation during 4.0 Education Era
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is a study of the productive instructional model for creating productivity and innovation during 4.0 by reviewing theoretical concepts from relevant academic papers and research which have objective 1) Study of the instructional Model for creating productivity 2) Apply basic teaching principles to productive instructional model to correspond with Thailand’s 20-Year National Strategy (2017 – 2036) aims to develop and reform economic structure to be driven by innovative technology (Value-Based Economy). It also aims to change new educational trends to focus on productivity and innovation. Therefore, the Education of Thailand 4.0 is considered as productivity-based era which aims to create product. The result from the study founded:
1.The study of the productive instructional model teaching model requires various teaching methods to help the learners to construct new knowledge to create their own products. There are 7 instructional model teaching: 1) Problem-Based Learning 2) Analyze case studies 3) Research-Based Learning 4) Project-Based Learning 5) Productivity-Based Learning 6) Productivity-Based Learning and 7) Crystal-Based Learning
2. Apply basic teaching principles to productive instructional model There are a total of 5 steps: 1) Situated learning 2) Creative-based learning 3) Self-directed learning and collaborative learning
4) Project-based learning and 5) Mini company project. The teacher will have an opportunity to revise both previous knowledge and the new one to pass on the knowledge to the learners, to lead them to have a better behavior, and to improve thinking process. It will also help the learners to find their own potential and their strengths to reach the effective and efficient learning goals. Thus, This learning process will promote high quality education which benefits to the learners and the teachers also the productivity-based instructional model is an important force to drive economic and social changes in Thailand in the future.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, K. (2006). The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. National Center on Education and Economy.
Areesophonpichet, S. (2017). Productivity-based School. In P. Sinlarat (Ed.), Kid Phalitaphaab: Sorn Lae Saang Yang Rai [Productivity Thinking: How to teach and create] (2nd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Bloom, B.S. (1972). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. David Mckay Company.
Chareonwongsak, K. (2016). The New Future of Thai Education in Thailand 4.0 Era. Mahidol University Library and Knowledge Center. http://www.li.mahidol.ac.th/conference2016/thailand4.pdf
Cranton, P. (2016). Understanding & Promoting Transformative Learning: A Guide to Theory and Practice. (3rd ed.). Stylus Publishing.
Daud, & Salina. (2008). Knowledge Creation and Innovation in Classroom. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences., 4(2), 440-442.
Delahaye, B. L. (2005). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. John Wiley & Sons.
Gomaratut, S. (2014). Productivity-based Learning. Journal of Education Prince of Songkla University, 25(3), 1-11.
Harel, I and Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.
Holgado, A., & Penalvo, F.J. (2017).A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. Learning and collaboration technologies: Novel learning ecosystems. Springer International Publishing.
Jenson, M.C., & Meckling, W. (2001). Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. Replika Press.
Kondratova, l., Molyneaux, H., & Fournier, H. (2017). Design considerations for competency functionality within a learning ecosystem.Learning and collaboration technologies: Novel learning ecosystems. Springer International Publishing.
Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. (2002). The leadership challenge. (3rd ed). Jossey-Bass.
Lekhakula, A. (2011). Problem-based Learning. Huachiew Chalermprakiet University.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. D. Van Nostrand Company Ine.
McKinney, S. E. (2008.Developing teachers for high-poverty school: The role of the internship experience. Urban Education, 43(1), 68-82.
Na Ayudhya, J. (2010). Khunnatham Nam Kwamroo [Virtues Leading Knowledge]. Free Mind Publishing.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2017). Wijai Kaanriankaansorn [Instructional Research] (3rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Patton, A. and Robin, J. (2012.Work that matters: The teachers’ guide to project based Learning. Pual Hamlyn Foundation, Learning Futures.
Sinlarat, P. (2008). Ajaan Mue Aacheep Naewkid Krueangmue Lae Kaanpattana [Professional teachers, Concepts, Instruments, and Development]. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Ministry of Education.
Sinlarat, P. (2015). Rongrian Phalitaphaab: Sattathat phuea kaanjudkaan [Productivity-based School: media for learning management]. College of Education Sciences, Dhurakij Pundit University.
Sinlarat, P. (2016). Kid Phalitaphaab: Sorn Lae Saang Yang Rai [Productivity Thinking: How to teach and create]. Chulalongkorn University Press.
Sinlarat, P. (2017). Rongrian 4.0: Rongrian Phalitaphaab [School 4.0: Productive School] (2nd ed.). College of Education Sciences, Dhurakij Pundit University.
Sinlarat, P., & Juithong, S. (2021). Productive Learning in Higher Education]. In P. Sinlarat (Ed.), Kaansuksa Choeng Phalitaphaab: Kaanrian kaansorn Phuea Saang Pholphalit Lae Nawattakam [Productive Education: Education for productivity and innovation]. Chulalongkorn University Press.
Songkram, N. (2019). Kaansaang Nawattakam: Plean Phoorian Haipen Phoo Saang Nawattakam [Inventing Innovation: Turn Learners into Innovators] (3rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Strobel, J., van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta- analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046
Sutthirat, C. (2018). Nawattakam Kaanjudkaanrianroo Tee Nenphoorian Pensamkan [Innovative learning-oriented Learning Management]. P Balance Design & Printing.
Udom, P. (2011). Active teaching and learning approaches in science (ATLAS). Journal of Education Faculty of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani campus, 22(3), 320-321.
United States department of Agriculture. (2015). Head, Heart, Hands and Health: 4-H Engages America’s Youth. https://nifa.usda.gov
Wallace, V., & Husid, W. (2012). Learning to the second power: Inquiry-based collaboration and learning commons. Teacher Librarian, 39(3), 25-29.
Wongpibool, P. (2017). Active Learning. Journal of Yanasangvorn Research Institute Mahamakut Buddhist University, 8(2), 327–336.
Youngsuksathaporn, P. (2018). Nawattakorn See Baeb [4 Types of Innovators]. National Innovation Agency.
Zhao, Y. (2012).World Class Learners: Educating Creative and Entrepreneurial Students. A sage Company.
