ภาพตัวแทน : ความจริง : ศิลปะ : สุนทรียะ
Main Article Content
Abstract
ปรับปรุงจากบรรยายสำหรับการประชุมวิชาการมนุษยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ วันที่ 9 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2560
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The articles published are the copyright of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University.
The views and opinions expressed in the articles published in this journal are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Editorial Board or Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University.
References
Barb Stuckey, Taste Surprising Stories and Science about Why Food Tastes Good, (New York: Atria, 2012), p. 55.
Brook Ziporyn, Coherence in Early Chinese Thought: Prolegomena to the Study of Li, (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012), p. 14.
Francois Jullien, Detour and Access Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece, translated by Sophie Hawkes, (New York: Zone Books, 2004), p. 142.
Francois Jullien, “Did Philosophers Have to Become Fixated on Truth?”, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Summer, 2002), pp. 803-824.
Francois Jullien, This Strange Idea of the Beautiful, translated by Kryzstof Fijalkowski and Michael Richardson, (New York: Seagull Books, 2016), p. 37.
Harrie A. Vanderstappen, The Landscape Painting of China: Musings of a Journeyman, edited by Roger E. Covey, (Gainville: University of Florida Press, 2014), pp. 6-7.
Li Zehou, The Chinese Aesthetic Tradition, translated by Maija Bell Samei, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2010), p. 1.
Patricia Bjaaland Welch, Chinese Art A Guide to Motif and Visual Imagery, (Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing, 2008), p. 17.
Rudolf Arnheim, “ Ancient Chinese Aesthetics and Its Modernity, British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 37, Issue 2 (April, 1997), p. 155.
Wen C. Fong, Beyond Representation Chinese Painting and Calligraphy 8-14th Century, (New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1992), p. 5.
William Pietz, “The Problem of Fetish, I”, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, No. 9, (Spring, 1985), pp. 5-17; “The Problem of Fetish, II”, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, No. 13 (Spring, 1987), pp. 23-45.