INTEGRATING VISUAL LEARING FOR TEACHER IN ELEMENTARY LEVEL
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the conceptual integration of learning concepts for primary school teachers. It uses various visual symbols. To submit information that aligns with the nature of primary school students who have not yet developed fluency in reading and writing. As learning process organizers, teachers should consider the principles for selecting practical visual tools suitable for learners to learn at their full potential. The article contains learning style Theories supporting learning management approaches, importance, tools, and process steps. And the integration of artistic principles with the creation of visual tools for primary school learners as a guideline for teachers to apply in teaching and learning management.
Article Details
References
ศักดิ์คเรศ ประกอบผล. (2563). การวิเคราะห์ผู้เรียน ลีลาการเรียนรู้. ครุศาสตร์สาร, 14(2), 1-14.
Daniels, S. (2018). Visual learning and teaching : an essential guide for educators k-8. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.
DiCarlo, S. E. (2009). Too much content, not enough thinking, and too little FUN! Advances in Physiology Education, 33(4), 257-264. doi:10.1152/advan.00075.2009
Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, 7(4), 4-7.
Greenhoot, A. F., & Semb, P. A. (2008). Do illustrations enhance preschoolers’ memories for stories? Age-related change in the picture facilitation effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(4), 271-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.06.005
Hyerle, D. (2008). Visual tools for transforming information into knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Liu, S. Y., Lee, Y. H., & Wang, M. Y. (2013). The effects of integrating interactive multimedia simulations into an elementary school science curriculum. Computers & Education, 60(1), 36-48.
Loch, B., Deiglmayr, A., & Moelter, M. J. (2019). Visual aesthetics in multimedia learning: An exploration of the influence of color and aesthetics on learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1575-1597.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Montgomery, Susan, M., & Linda, N. G. (1998). Students learning styles and their implication for teaching: Center for research on Learning and Teaching (Occasional Papers)(10).
Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution; a dual coding theoretical interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roam, D. (2013). The back of the napkin : solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Tversky, B. (2010). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 499-535. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x
Whitehouse, A. J. O., Maybery, M. T., & Durkin, K. (2006). The development of the picture-superiority effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 767-773. doi:10.1348/026151005X74153
Yildiz, E., & Moseley, C. (2019). The effects of visual learning strategies on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(3), 213-231.
