ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a blended online course in Practical English Phonetics. The subjects were 67 students from purposive sampling, including two groups of students. The first group of students was majoring in English education and the second group of students was majoring in Business English. Both groups were second-year students of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University taking the Practical English Phonetics Course in the second semester of the 2018 academic year. The research tools were the following:
1) Online Blended Course of Practical English Phonetics 2) Achievement tests including Pretest and Posttest 3) Evaluation form of the effectiveness of the blended online course on LMS by experts in IT education
4) Students satisfaction survey in the blended online course in Practical English Phonetics.
The statistical analysis consisted of the course efficiency, mean, standard deviation and t-test dependent. The results showed that the blended online course had efficiency at 82.84/94.73, which was higher than the criteria. The students’ learning achievement indicated a statistically significant level of .05. In addition, the students’ satisfaction survey suggested that the students were satisfied with the course at a high level.
Article Details
References
Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Blended learning: A ubiquitous learning environment for reading comprehension. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2 (1): Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p97
Cheng, S.-C., Hwang, W.-Y., Wu, S.-Y., Shadiev, R., & Xie, C.-H. (2010). A mobile device and online system with contextual familiarity and its effects on English learning on campus. Educational Technology & Society. 13(3): 93–109
Colpaert, J. (2004). From courseware to courseware? Computer Assisted Language Learning. 17(3-4): 261-266A
Hojnacki, S. (2016). Oral Output in Online Modules vs. Face-To-Face Classrooms. In McCarthy, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge Guide to Blended Learning for Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 107-122.
Johnson, R. F. (2013). Student attitudes toward blended and online courses: A comparison of students in traditional classroom writing environments and students in online classroom environment [Dissertation]. University of North Texas.
Johnson, C. P., & Marsh, D. (2013). The Laureate English Program: Taking a research informed approach to blended learning. Higher Learning Research Communications. Available from: http://journals.sfu.ca/liu/index.php/HLRC/article/view/103
King, T. (2016). The ‘Onstream’ Project: Collaboration between teachers in mainstream and supplementary schools. In A. Beaven, A. Comas-Quinn & B. Sawhill (Eds.), Case Studies of Openness in the Language Classroom. Dubin: Vollians. 110-120.
Kirkwood, A. (2004). Networked learning in context: What does e-learning offer students working independently, and what do they bring to it? In D. Murphy, R. Carr, J. Taylor & T. Wong (Eds.), Distance Education and Technology: Issues and
Practice. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press. 217-229.
Kirkwood, A. T., Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in
Higher Education. 30(3): 257-274
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2): Available from: http://goo.gl/Pbv5n
Lee, S., & Lee, C.H. (2013). A case study on the effects of an L2 writing instructional model for blended learning in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 12(4): 1-10
Marsh, D. (2012). Blended learning: Creating learning opportunities for language earners. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nakazawa, K. (2009). Student engagement in online language learning: A case study examining the online delivery of tertiary language courses. The International Journal of Learning. 16(7): 405-414
Oweis, T. (2018). Effects of using a blended learning method on students’ achievement and motivation to learn English in Jordan: A pilot case study. Hindawi Education Research International. Article ID #7425924: Available from:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2018/7425924/
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley (MA) : Newbury House. 235-253.
________. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah (NJ) : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 471-484.
Wu, J., & Liu, W. (2013). An empirical investigation of the critical factors affecting students' satisfaction in EFL blended learning. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(1): 176-185