An Analytical Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption on Job Satisfaction Among Office Employees in the Lower Northern Region of Thailand
คำสำคัญ:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Behavioral Intention, Job Satisfactionบทคัดย่อ
This study investigates employees’ acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) and its influence on behavioral intention and job satisfaction in AI-integrated workplaces. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research examines perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm, self-efficacy, and attitude as predictors of AI adoption. A quantitative, causal-predictive, cross-sectional design was employed, and data were collected from 456 office employees in Thailand’s Lower Northern Region who had prior experience using workplace AI tools. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess the measurement and structural models, while regression analysis provided additional explanatory insights.
Results indicate that employees reported high levels of perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, subjective norm, and positive attitudes toward AI. Four TAM variables perceived usefulness, attitude toward AI, self-efficacy, and subjective norm had significant positive effects on behavioral intention, collectively explaining 31.4% of its variance. Perceived ease of use was not a significant predictor once other variables were accounted for, suggesting that experienced users prioritize performance benefits over usability simplicity. Findings related to job satisfaction show that employees who perceived AI as useful, confidence-enhancing, and aligned with workplace expectations reported higher satisfaction levels. Positive attitudes toward AI were also associated with improved job satisfaction, indicating that acceptance and satisfaction are mutually reinforcing in digitally transforming organizations. Conversely, uncertainty about AI’s relevance or low ease of use showed indirect negative associations with satisfaction, though these effects were weaker than performance-related determinants. Overall, the study demonstrates that AI adoption influences not only employees’ behavioral intentions but also their job satisfaction in meaningful ways. Performance-oriented perceptions, strengthened self-efficacy, and supportive workplace norms play central roles in promoting both satisfaction and sustained AI use. These insights highlight the need for targeted training, communication strategies, and organizational support systems to optimize AI integration and enhance employees’ work experiences.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
An, S., Eck, T., & Yim, H. (2023). Understanding consumers’ acceptance intention to use mobile food delivery applications through an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 15(1), 832.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J.-H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals’ decision to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297–311.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Department of Labour Protection and Welfare. (n.d.). Definition of office employees and workplace classification. Ministry of Labour, Thailand.
Digital Economy Promotion Agency. (2020). Thailand digital transformation framework 2020. Bangkok: Ministry of Digital Economy and Society.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
Madukoma, E., Akpa, V., & Okafor, U. (2014). Effect of training and motivation on job performance of library personnel of University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal, 1(8), 1–8.
Maruping, L. M., Bala, H., Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2017). Going beyond intention: An integrative model of technology adaptation over time in the workplace. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 747–779.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). The state of AI in 2020. McKinsey Global Institute.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD employment outlook 2019: The future of work. OECD Publishing.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). Free Press.
SAS Institute Inc. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence: What it is and why it matters. SAS.
Unis, B., Johansson, I., & Sällström, C. (2015). Rural high school students’ sexual behavior and self-esteem. Open Journal of Nursing, 5(1), 24–35.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
หมวดหมู่
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 วารสารจิตวิทยาพุทธศาสตร์ประยุกต์เพื่อสังคม

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.