Application Of Foresight Tools to Develop A Community Enterprise For Processing Produce, Village No. 8, Khlong Hok, Khlong Luang District, Pathum Thani Province

Authors

  • Trimas Phunphon School of Public Administration, Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, Thailand
  • Siwalai Jongjiraphat School of Business Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, Thailand
  • Yada Napha-Ar-Rak School of Public Administration, Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, Thailand
  • Suriwipawan Kunpiluk School of Business Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, Thailand

Keywords:

Foresight Tools, Development, Community Enterprise

Abstract

From the impact of the floods in 2011, a group of entrepreneurs turned the crisis into an opportunity from the original capital which was rice fields and a pond during that time there was still a lot of water stagnation, so the entrepreneurs started investing and continued the cultivation until the present day, selling products in the form of fresh fish and sunfish until it became more well known. As a result, in 2015, the community received support from the Pathum Thani Provincial Agricultural Office in setting up a community enterprise and was provided with a variety of distribution channels. The important things that   entrepreneurs attached were standards, cleanliness, safety, and best care in providing services.

          Another important thing in developing community enterprises for sustainability was analyzing the social return on investment of the project (SROI), it consisted of analyzing 5 aspects: (1) Input (2) Activity (3) Output (4) Outcome of (5) Impacts from the development guidelines cause changes in 5 dimensions: (1) Economics (2) Education (3) Environmental (4) Social, and (5) Mind

          From analyzing the ways of using future-looking tools with community enterprise groups towards sustainability, it was found that preparing for change that helped the enterprise group prepare for situations that might occur in the future consisted of (1) Perspective on the future (2) Setting implications for planning (3) Shared decision-making by all parties involved to avoid conflicts in the future.

References

ไชยยะ คงมณี. (2565). แนวคิดการประเมินผลลัพธ์และผลกระทบของโครงการวิจัย: Economic Analysis & Social Return On Investment, SROI, (ออนไลน์). สืบค้นจาก: https://rdo.psu.ac.th, (11 กรกฎาคม 2566).

นราวิทย์ ศรีเปารยะ. (2012). คุณสมบัติ นักพัฒนาตามทฤษฎี 5 IN (Innovation Mix). (ออนไลน์). สืบค้นจาก: https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/369101. (11 กรกฎาคม 2566).

สถาบันการมองอนาคตนวัตกรรม (IFI). (2562). เครื่องมือการมองอนาคต. สำนักงานนวัตกรรมแห่งชาติ (องค์การมหาชน) กระทรวงวิทยาศาสตร์ และเทคโนโลยี.

สำนักงานกองทุนสนับสนุนการสร้างเสริมสุขภาพ (สสส.). (2565). การวิเคราะห์ผลตอบแทนทางสังคม: Social Return On Investment (SROI). (ออนไลน์). สืบค้นจาก: https://thailand-sroi.online/. (11 กรกฎาคม 2566).

Dmc.tv. (2554). น้ำท่วมปทุมธานี สถานการณ์น้ำท่วมปทุมฯล่าสุด Update!. (ออนไลน์). สืบค้นจาก: https://www.dmc.tv/article/12299. (11 กรกฎาคม 2566)

Popper, R. (2008, October). “How are foresight methods selected?”. Foresight. 10(6). 62-89.

Slaughter, R. (1996, October). “Future Studies: Form Individual to Social Capacity”. Futures. 28(8). 751-762.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Phunphon, T., Jongjiraphat, S. ., Napha-Ar-Rak, Y., & Kunpiluk, S. (2024). Application Of Foresight Tools to Develop A Community Enterprise For Processing Produce, Village No. 8, Khlong Hok, Khlong Luang District, Pathum Thani Province. Journal of Nakhonratchasima college (Humanities and Social Sciences), 18(3), 364–375. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsjournalnmc/article/view/274927