CREATING TO COMMUNICATE: HOW PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THROUGH VLOG CREATION ENHANCES GRAMMAR LEARNING IN EFL UNIVERSITY CLASSROOMS

Main Article Content

Paweena Jaruteerapan

Abstract

While grammar remains a central component of language learning, persistent challenges remain in enabling learners to apply grammatical knowledge in authentic communicative contexts. Traditional grammar instruction, which relies heavily on textbooks and drill-based exercises, often results in inert knowledge that is difficult to apply spontaneously in real-world communicative context. This study investigates how Project-Based Learning (PBL) through vlog creation enhances the development and application of grammatical knowledge among EFL university students. A mixed-methods design was employed with eleven groups of English-major students (n = 79). These students enrolled in an English grammar course and completed a group-based vlog project as part of the course assessment. Quantitative data were collected through grammar pretests, posttests, and questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-test. Students’ vlog performances were evaluated with inter-rater reliability using a five-level rubric-based framework. In addition, qualitative data from reflective reports were analyzed thematically to capture learners’ experiences in the vlog project. The findings were as follows:


(1) Students demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in grammatical knowledge from pretest to posttest, with posttest mean scores significantly higher than pretest mean scores, t(78) = −11.92, p < .001.


(2) Students’ ability to use grammar in communication was evident in the strongest development in the meaning and use dimensions of their vlogs, as further supported by qualitative data from reflective reports.


The results suggest that vlog-based PBL provides an effective pedagogical approach for integrating grammar instruction with communicative language use in English language teaching. The study also offers practical implications for ELT educators to develop more effective teaching practices that promote greater learner engagement.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaruteerapan, P. (2026). CREATING TO COMMUNICATE: HOW PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THROUGH VLOG CREATION ENHANCES GRAMMAR LEARNING IN EFL UNIVERSITY CLASSROOMS. Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 8(3), 213–225. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/art/article/view/301747
Section
Research Articles

References

Bikowski, D. (2018). Technology for teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441

DeCapua, A. (2017). Grammar for teachers: A guide to American English for native and non-native speakers (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33916-0

DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 94–112). Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512

Gul, N., Noor, S., & Khan, S. (2022). Exploring the three-dimensional grammar framework: A case study of modal verbs at English language centers in Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 5(4), 73–83.

https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i4.643

Jung, C. D. (2021). Perceptions of collaborative video projects in the language classroom: A qualitative case study. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 301–320.

https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14418a

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Thomson & Heinle.

Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon

Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient, and engaging instruction. Pfeiffer.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge.

Nguyen, V. M. (2021). Positive effects of video-based projects on communicative English grammar lessons. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(3), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i3.666

Nikouee, M., & Oba, T. (2025). Beyond drills: Optimizing grammar practice for transfer. TESL Canada Journal, 42(1), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v42i1/1427

Pawlak, M. (2021). Teaching foreign language grammar: New solutions, old problems. Foreign Language Annals, 54(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12563

Sadaf, H., Rasheed, B., & Ahmad, A. (2024). Exploring the role of YouTube lectures, vlogs, and videos in enhancing ESL learning. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(2), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.2.52

Saputro, T. H., Tafsirudin, I. C., & Farah, R. R. (2020). The use of vlog in improving students’ oral language production: A case study. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 13(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v13i1.5298

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.

Spring, R. (2020). Can video-creation project work affect students' oral proficiency? An analysis of fluency, complexity and accuracy. TESL-EJ, 24(2), 1–17. https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej94/a2.pdf

Thornbury, S. (2001). How to teach grammar. Longman.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wen, X., & Zhu, X. (2022). The teaching design of English grammar in senior high school based on the three-dimensional dynamic grammar teaching theory. Frontiers in Educational Research, 5(5), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2022.050511

Williams, J. D. (2003). Grammar and usage. In I. L. Clark (Ed.), Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing (pp. 313–337). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1