DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT MODEL TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL QUALITY IN SCHOOLS UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICE AREA OFFICE OF PHANG NGA, PHUKET, AND RANONG

Main Article Content

Pornthip Nugulkit

Abstract

         This research aimed to: (1) examine the components, current conditions, desirable conditions, and priority needs regarding high-performance organizational management for enhancing educational quality; (2) develop a high-performance organizational management model for enhancing educational quality; (3) implement the developed model in secondary schools; and (4) evaluate the outcomes of applying the high-performance organizational management model for enhancing educational quality.


          The study employed a research and development design, utilizing high-performance organizational concepts and theories as the conceptual framework. The sample consisted of 398 participants - comprising school administrators, deputy administrators, and teachers - affiliated with the Secondary Education Service Area Offices of Phang Nga, Phuket, and Ranong, selected through purposive sampling. Three research instruments were employed: (1) a questionnaire, (2) an interview form, and (3) an evaluation form. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis with descriptive narrative. The findings were as follows:


          1) The analysis of components and priority needs revealed that educational institutions required a systematic management model emphasizing operational efficiency, personnel development, and the elevation of educational quality in a structured manner.


          2) The developed high-performance organizational management model comprised six components: principles, objectives, management mechanisms and processes, implementation guidelines, evaluation, and success conditions. The model incorporated seven management mechanisms: vision and strategy formulation, strategic leadership, knowledge management, process management, human resource development, stakeholder focus, and performance focus.


          3) The implementation and evaluation results indicated that participating educational institutions demonstrated increasing in educational quality. Moreover, assessments of
the model's appropriateness, feasibility, and user satisfaction were rated at a high level.


          The knowledge gained from this research is a high-performance organizational management model that can serve as a systematic and sustainable framework for developing educational institutions and enhancing educational quality.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugulkit, P. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT MODEL TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL QUALITY IN SCHOOLS UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICE AREA OFFICE OF PHANG NGA, PHUKET, AND RANONG . Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 8(3), 70–83. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/art/article/view/297402
Section
Research Articles

References

ปนัดดา ศุภรานนท์ (2566). กลยุทธ์การบริหารโรงเรียนสังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษามัธยมศึกษาชัยภูมิสู่การเป็นองค์การสมรรถนะสูง. วารสารสมาคมพัฒนาวิชาชีพการบริหารการศึกษาแห่งประเทศไทย (สพบท.), 6(1), 352–366. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JAPDEAT/article/view/269888.

ธันวา วาทิตต์พันธ์. (2564). องค์ประกอบของโรงเรียนมัธยมศึกษาสมรรถนะสูง. [วิทยานิพนธ์ดุษฎีบัณฑิต การบริหารการศึกษา]. มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.

ยุทธ ไกยวรรณ์. (2565). พื้นฐานการวิจัยทางการศึกษา. ศูนย์หนังสือแห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2566). สภาวะการศึกษาไทย ปี 2565/2566: การปฏิรูปการศึกษาในยุคดิจิทัล. พริกหวานกราฟฟิค.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2567). รายงานภาวะการศึกษาไทย ปี 2566–2567. กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

CIPD. (2023). Learning at work 2023. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Deloitte. (2023). Global human capital trends 2023: New fundamentals for a boundaryless world. Deloitte Insights.

Fullan, M. (2023). The right drivers for whole system success. Centre for Strategic Education.

Gartner. (2022). Top strategic technology and management trends for 2022. Gartner Research.

Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2022). Contemporary management (12th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

McKinsey & Company. (2022). Performance through people: Transforming human capital into competitive advantage. McKinsey Global Institute.

Namchaidee, C., Sirisuthi, C., & Agsonsua, P. (2023). Development of administrative model for high-performance organization of primary educational service area office. International Journal of Higher Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v12n6p11

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f2383c-en

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2022). Management (15th ed.). Pearson.

UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

UNICEF. (2023). Transforming education: Building resilient and inclusive education systems. UNICEF.

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/