CYBER POWER AND UNITED STATES AS THE GLOBAL BRAIN
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article examines the role of the United States as a cyber superpower and analyzes the mechanisms that facilitate its position as the “Global Brain” in the context of the 21st century. The study employs the concept of the Global Brain in conjunction with David D. Clark’s four-layer cyberspace framework, consisting of the physical layer, logical layer, information layer, and user layer. This research adopts a qualitative methodology based on documentary research, drawing upon sources related to cybersecurity policy and the evolving dynamics of power in the digital era throughout the 21st century. The findings reveal that the United States possesses advantages across all layers of cyberspace, particularly through cyber development policies that promote control over digital infrastructure, technological innovation driven by private-sector leadership, and the influence of major technology companies. In addition, the United States has implemented comprehensive cyber strategies, including infrastructure investment, human resource development, and alliance-building, enabling it to shape information flows and sustain leadership within the international system. However, the dynamics of international political power have been challenged by the growing role of rival powers such as China and Russia, intensifying competition in cyberspace and contributing to technological fragmentation. Therefore, cyber power has become a crucial component of the global power structure. The concept of the Global Brain does not fully reflect a decentralized system; rather, it indicates a tendency toward the concentration of information within major powers and large technology corporations. This reflects the transformation of power in the digital age and underscores the importance of balancing innovation, security, and equitable access to information in the future, while effectively addressing governance risks and long-term challenges.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Clark, D. D. (2010). Characterizing Cyberspace: Past, Present and Future. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/141692
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2021). Advanced persistent threat compromise of government agencies, critical infrastructure, and private sector organizations. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa20-352a
Devanny, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and cyber power: Foreign policy implications. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/LM698
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/the-fourth-revolution
Healey, J. (2018). The implications of persistent (and permanent) engagement in cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity, 4(1), 1-15.
Heylighen, F. & Lenartowicz, M. (2017). The Global Brain as a model of the future information society: An introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.063
International Telecommunication Union. (2022). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2022. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/Fh2Ou
Kello, L. (2017). The virtual weapon and international order. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/2eXV4
Kyriazis, M. (2015). Systems neuroscience in focus: From the human brain to the global brain? Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00007
Nye, J. S. (2017). Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace. International Security, 41(3), 44-71.
Segal, A. (2016). The hacked world order: How nations fight, trade, maneuver, and manipulate in the digital age. Retrieved August 25, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/V6EnO
Singer, P. W. & Friedman, A. (2013). Cybersecurity and cyberwar: What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.
TeleGeography. (2023). Do submarine cables account for over 99% of intercontinental data traffic? Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://shorturl.asia/oqpU0
The White House. (2023). National Cyber Workforce and Education Strategy. Retrieved August 2, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/Xo39H