Model for Decoding Symbols in the Taishan Stone Culture

Ruiduan Yao; Kosoom  Saichai; Thongchue  Khiatthong

doi:10.60027/iarj.2026.e299229

Authors

Ruiduan Yao Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9724-2732
Kosoom Saichai Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2051-8900
Thongchue Khiatthong Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9925-4819

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e299229

Keywords:

Taishan Stone Culture, Symbol Decoding, Semiotics, Digital Archive, Cultural Heritage

Abstract

Background and Aims: Taishan stone culture, a UNESCO World Heritage site, embodies rich symbolic meanings spanning nature worship, imperial rituals, and folk beliefs. Current research faces fragmentation in symbolic interpretation and lacks systematic digital archive models. This study aims to: (1) analyze symbolic components, artistic structures, and cultural values of Taishan stone culture; (2) develop a symbol decoding model for digital archive construction; and (3) evaluate the model's scientificity, operability, and applicability.

Methodology: This qualitative research employs a three-stage design: theoretical and documentary analysis of 230+ academic sources; symbolic decoding through semiotic frameworks (Saussure, Peirce, Barthes); and model construction with expert evaluation (N=10), including researchers, inheritors, conservators, and creative industry professionals.

Results: Four core cultural connotations were identified: natural sacredness, religious belief, imperial authority, and folk customs. A multi-dimensional symbol decoding model was constructed with three layers (natural, cultural, artistic elements) and four analytical dimensions (formal, semantic, spatiotemporal, stakeholder). Expert evaluation indicated scientific validity (mean 4.6/5), operability (4.4/5), and applicability (4.5/5).

Conclusion: The model provides a systematic framework for interpreting Taishan stone symbols and transforming cultural elements into structured data for digital archiving, bridging traditional heritage research and modern digital preservation.

References

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957). https://books.google.com/books?id=jP-DBAAAQBAJ

Brady, L. M., & Gunn, R. G. (2012). Digital documentation and semiotic analysis of Australian Aboriginal rock art. Rock Art Research, 29(2), 145–162.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Gregory, I. N., & Ell, P. S. (2007). Historical GIS: Technologies, methodologies, and scholarship. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/55631/frontmatter/9780521855631_frontmatter.pdf

Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857

Hoskins, A. (2012). The materiality of memory. Routledge.

Keyser, J. D., & Whitley, D. S. (2012). Rock art of the Columbia River Gorge. Oregon Archaeological Society Press.

Li, H. Y. (2019). Research on Taishan stone culture: Historical evolution and contemporary value. Shandong People’s Publishing House.

Li, H. Y. (2021). Spatiotemporal evolution of Taishan Shigandang belief: A GIS-based analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage Studies, 45(3), 234–251.

O’Toole, M. (2011). The language of displayed art (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Language-of-Displayed-Art/OToole/p/book/9780415595278

Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=GZUYAAAAYAAJ

Papanicolaou, L. (2019). Beyond denotation: Connotative and mythological layers in heritage interpretation. Semiotica, 2019(228), 245–268.

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers (Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Duckworth. (Original work published 1916).

Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/1263-postmodern-geographies

Wang, K. Y. (2006). Complete collection of Mount Tai stone inscriptions. Zhonghua Book Company.

Whitley, D. S. (2005). Introduction to rock art research. Left Coast Press.

Yuan, A. G. (2009). A study on the Shigandang belief at Mount Tai. Shandong University Press.

Zeng, X. (2019). Digital Dunhuang: A case study in large-scale cultural heritage digitization. International Journal of Digital Heritage, 3(2), 89–104.

Zhang, D. (2020). A semiotic decoding model for traditional architectural decoration based on Peircean theory. Architectural Journal, 78(4), 89–102.

Zhang, H. R. (2018). Research on symbol decoding and digital archive model construction. Cultural Heritage, 56(2), 112–128.

Zhang, H. R. (2021). Spatiotemporal integration in heritage semiotics. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(3), 45–67.

Zhao, Y. C. (2021). Regional cultural symbol decoding model. Regional Culture Research, 33(1), 67–83.